1 hour ago, Bayushi Tsubaki said:

Lol, okay, it's official, I'm blind. For whatever reason the artwork upside down just didn't look right to me.

That said, I'm really unexcited for a 2/2 for 2 that wants to attack alone.

She is pretty bad right now and the ability is extremly overrated on a 2 str. body. And people are still complaining online.

29 minutes ago, Ignithas said:

She is pretty bad right now and the ability is extremly overrated on a 2 str. body. And people are still complaining online.

The card is useful during the 1st round of gameplay, as there won't be many characters out yet and the field is rather narrow in opposition. As the game proceeds, her value drops significantly.

Id play all 3 copies in my deck due to wanting to draw her preferably in the first round. Afterwards, when she shows up in later Dynasty phases she will be (theoretically) competing with 'better' cards, but she will still be a good value at a cost of 2 Fate.

Again, all imo.

17 minutes ago, LordBlunt said:

The card is useful during the 1st round of gameplay, as there won't be many characters out yet and the field is rather narrow in opposition. As the game proceeds, her value drops significantly.

Id play all 3 copies in my deck due to wanting to draw her preferably in the first round. Afterwards, when she shows up in later Dynasty phases she will be (theoretically) competing with 'better' cards, but she will still be a good value at a cost of 2 Fate.

Again, all imo.

Every low cost character is usefull during the first rounds of the game. The difference is that some 2 cost characters remain valuable, because they have strong abilities or efficient stats. Mirumoto Prodigy is considerably weaker than Agashi Swordsmith and in most cases weaker than Niten Adept and even our 1 cost characters would be better, if they cost one more fate. Seeker of Enlightenment is just as bad, because the "Fate on rings" mechanic needs more support.