"When you overlap an enemy ship..."

Does this mean regardless of who executed the movement that resulted in the overlap?

-ie, it could be argued that when an enemy ship moves in such a way that they overlap with you (Garel's Honor), you are still considered to be "overlapping the enemy ship", even though you were not the one that instigated the movement that caused the overlap.

-similarly, I could see it argued that the implied meaning is that you (Garel's Honor) must be the one executing the movement that overlaps in the movement.

It's when you (Garel's Honor) overlap a ship that the effect is triggered. If another ship moves, Garel's Honor would still be on the table so the other ship is the one overlaping

31 minutes ago, Rocmistro said:

"When you overlap an enemy ship..."

Does this mean regardless of who executed the movement that resulted in the overlap?

-ie, it could be argued that when an enemy ship moves in such a way that they overlap with you (Garel's Honor), you are still considered to be "overlapping the enemy ship", even though you were not the one that instigated the movement that caused the overlap.

-similarly, I could see it argued that the implied meaning is that you (Garel's Honor) must be the one executing the movement that overlaps in the movement.

Wrong.

'You' is the ship that the upgrade is equipped.

Also, you overlap and overlapped by are two different things.

One ship is overlapping, another is being overlapped. This is important for various effects, not just Garel's Honor.