1 hour ago, Madaghmire said:

Sometimes people say things they shouldn't when their guard is down.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

No

19 minutes ago, Ginkapo said:

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

No

How is this post beneficial to town?

2 hours ago, TheToad said:

I meant in Pods post( I quoted Vis cause he said Pods post was useless)

Pods post made me think he might be third because he said he's specifically looking for someone ( whomever killed the captain)and then mentioned the dead captain being a good customer

maybe it's third party, maybe it's just more flavor nonsense, either way it's suspicious

Hmm. . . Lyncher-like role, maybe?

##vote @Ginkapo

howbowdah

15 minutes ago, Caldias said:

How is this post beneficial to town?

Appropriately shuts down irresponsible logic being used by far too many players in the game.

@Pod a vote without any argument is worthless. I just feel sorry for you.

Pod, you have been rambling about flavour as a horizontally inclined worker, avoids giving clear explanation or reasoning for what you were doing trying to "seduce" other players, and then votes for Gink without reason. Looking wildly suspicious to me. Seems to me like you are trying to avoid an attempt to make an analysis of your point of view, something I had a problem in my first game as mafia because I knew people were not mafia, and so I knew that no one had made any mistakes, and it made it harder to find them in texts by people who were town. Looks to me like you have the exact same problem, so you post pointless repetitive flavour to mark presence, and as people are looking into those wildly in flavour, in an attempt to have some seriousness accuses Gink, but can't find reasons and thus takes a provocative stance.

##vote PodRacer

So, I really don't have too much of an analysis to add to this thread, and thus would much rather stay silent, but I feel compelled to write something concerning PodRacer, Ovinomanc3r, Gink, and Truthiness.

@PodRacer - the analysis done above by Vis seemed fairly accurate, but perhaps your lack of productive posts is much like mine - you have nothing to say. I would suggest however that you in that case post nothing, rather than fruitlessly post nonsense that distracts from the issues at hand whilst also brushing aside accusations. It is suspicious, and I am sorely tempted to vote you because of it.

@ovinomanc3r - a similar thing goes for you. Your behavior is actually fairly ordinary for you first day, but I still can't make head or tail of it. Please speak up with something useful from time to time. I get you're trying to be funny, and you probably are (I happen to have no knowledge concerning that to which you are referring), but please do not resort entirely to humor, as it only takes up space and makes it so that we can't take anything you say seriously, and thus have issues discerning serious posts from further jokes. This is an issue, and may get you voted for.

@Ginkapo - Your behavior seems to be normal-ish, but I would like to point out that you started criticizing people for non-helpful posts only after you dropped out of the conversation. Remember the Moronto comments. I find that lack of consistency mildly off-putting, especially when you swing between a pacifistic 'victim' Gink (vote me for being kind! I don't care!) and the 'usual' Gink (MORONS) .I don't quite know what is going on here, and that worries me.

@Truthiness - your voting Gink, and your being anxious to get him lynched, followed by your decision to follow him based on one turn-around post is suspicious. Why be so adamant only to fold instantly? Were you trying to distance yourself, then seek an excuse to vote his targets?

Concerning the rest of you, my reads are even flimsier, so I shall refrain from posting them.

GNips, you have previously said you dont understand joke votes so I shall explain.

When the game starts there is nothing to say, so there is a period of joke voting where nothing much happens. Except that it does. Go read JJ's vote against me, that is a jokevote that has been forced, it stands out like a sore thumb because it wasnt an effortless post. (Benefit of the doubt that its just caused by lateness due to the decent post which immediately followed).

Then after a while someone breaks the jokevoting phase, in this case it was CNinja and Onid who brought us out of it with the first attempts at analysis. At this point its worthwhile turning up the heat as there is stuff to analyse, until then there is not.

There is a difference between calling me a pacifist and nice. They called me nice, I have no intention of changing that, I however will never be a pacifist, its not me. The game flows, flow with it.

@Vis, 10/10, great post.

1 hour ago, Ginkapo said:

@Pod a vote without any argument is worthless

Sorry allow me to elaborate, i was just off out to dinner when i voted.

I mentioned earlier that i was looking for biggs killer, I didnt feel that Gink shared my sentiments. Is that so Provocative?

5 minutes ago, PodRacer said:

Sorry allow me to elaborate, i was just off out to dinner when i voted.

I mentioned earlier that i was looking for biggs killer, I didnt feel that Gink shared my sentiments. Is that so Provocative?

You should address Visovics post. At this moment in time, it is the most cogent argument for putting a vote on anyone in the game.

20 minutes ago, PodRacer said:

Is that so Provocative?

you voted and said "howbowdah", in my book that's a provocative move

Gink deserved to be called out on his insolence. IMO

1 minute ago, PodRacer said:

Gink deserved to be called out on his insolence. IMO

What insolence exactly?

2 minutes ago, PodRacer said:

Gink deserved to be called out on his insolence. IMO

Is this it?

was there any other business you wished to discuss?

1 minute ago, PodRacer said:

was there any other business you wished to discuss?

A reasonable reason for the vote would do just fine

22 hours ago, Ginkapo said:

. Vis is a mood killer.

FML

14 minutes ago, PodRacer said:

Gink deserved to be called out on his insolence. IMO

Can you direct me to examples of this insolence please?

Just now, Ginkapo said:

Can you direct me to examples of this insolence please?

well it was the multi quote tirade that featured my name as holding the game back.

Made me Hangry.

Good point Pod, please answer the question, its very insoluent to ignore a question.

6 hours ago, PodRacer said:

right now im looking for someone

My best Client is dead, Who do You think named him Big?

We had something very special, Biggs and I, and i want to see the integrity of this fine establishment upheld in his Honour.

In the meantime gentlemen this is a place of business, and right now i dont hear many people here trying to sell anything other than meta calls, and wholesale morgan freeman

So in the interest of business... i will have a slug of space rum and a pipe of spice to get things moving a bit, will anyone join me?

@ovinomanc3r Can you help me out spicegirl? and if u WANNABE my lover then tonight maybe 2 become 1?

Or is there something else you desire in return?

5 hours ago, Ginkapo said:

How is this post beneficial to town?

Well, the Truthiness/Gink situation seems to have resolved itself. Truthi still looks to me like someone trying to capitalize on the potential of an easy D1 lynch, but Pod's consistent refusal to answer questions and provide reasoning for votes is much more of a red flag to me.

I'd really like an explanation for your vote on Gink, and your refusal to respond to subsequent inquiry.

##unvote

##vote @PodRacer

16 minutes ago, Ginkapo said:

How is this post beneficial to town?

In this instance those who do not seek to bring Bigs killer to justice will be forced to out themselves,

1 minute ago, PodRacer said:

In this instance those who do not seek to bring Bigs killer to justice will be forced to out themselves,

How is this post beneficial to town?

You would have to ask the Town

##unvote