Just now, PodRacer said:

@Visovics has coconuts for testicles

^This made my day xD

22.5 hours...

Just now, PodRacer said:

22.5 hours...

So assuming that your dilly-dallying was for people to slip-up, what have you noticed, and whom do you suggest we vote for?

We have less than a quarter of the day to find a scum, Truth looks most suspicious to me with his vote fest and him insisting on Gink

i would strongly reccomend people who bandwagoned me, as opposed to the people who verified their positions

only scum wanted me dead in that position, and iv been looking for the strongman whos gonna ride my *** now Big is gone

So. . . Truthiness, Madaghmire, and Gink?

Out of those three I'd be looking at Gink or Truthi.

As we haven't much time left:

##vote Truthiness

What have you to say in your defense? I hesitate to vote without much evidence, but time's a'pressin'.

Just now, GhostofNobodyInParticular said:

So. . . Truthiness, Madaghmire, and Gink?

Out of those three I'd be looking at Gink or Truthi.

As we haven't much time left:

##vote Truthiness

What have you to say in your defense? I hesitate to vote without much evidence, but time's a'pressin'.

Still got 22 hours, there is time to lay evidence, defense and overall view of it from the whole group

I mean, sure, we've got less than a quarter of the day left. But in absolute terms, we still have almost half of the day period we normally deal with in these games. 22 hours is not last-minute, by any stretch of the imagination.

3 minutes ago, Visovics said:

Still got 22 hours, there is time to lay evidence, defense and overall view of it from the whole group

who do you suspect the most @Visovics ?

4 minutes ago, Visovics said:

Still got 22 hours, there is time to lay evidence, defense and overall view of it from the whole group

Oh, I agree. I just fear that if it took us 74 hours to 'settle' the PodRacer question, we should get a head start on putting pressure on Truthiness. I am in no way convinced of my vote, nor am I just randomly voting. I do hope that it will elicit a response that allows us to end the day having voted a player who has nearly convinced us of his guilt through his posts (though that needn't be Truthines mind).

Just now, GhostofNobodyInParticular said:

(though that needn't be Truthiness mind).

Man that'll bug me.

Anyways, I wanted to spark conversation again, though unfortunately at an accelerated pace.

2 minutes ago, PodRacer said:

who do you suspect the most @Visovics ?

Truth, he is constantly after Gink, and had an absolute vote fest, of the people who were voted at least once, he is in 4 out of 7, with an additional vote on Gink and the one pre-game that Biggs said didn't count.

do gink and truthiness have previous?

6 minutes ago, Visovics said:

Truth, he is constantly after Gink, and had an absolute vote fest, of the people who were voted at least once, he is in 4 out of 7, with an additional vote on Gink and the one pre-game that Biggs said didn't count.

My "pre-game" vote came immediately following my Role PM, whatever foul Biggs wants to call. You know deep in your heart that I'm town. It's day one, so of course I'm gonna vote around.

Whatever Pod wants to say at this point doesn't matter to me. I don't believe it. My vote is staying put. Dripping breadcrumbs while people are screaming for a reveal doesn't mean a thing. Gink backing him up looks sketchy as well.

Just now, Truthiness said:

My "pre-game" vote came immediately following my Role PM, whatever foul Biggs wants to call. You know deep in your heart that I'm town. It's day one, so of course I'm gonna vote around.

Whatever Pod wants to say at this point doesn't matter to me. I don't believe it. My vote is staying put. Dripping breadcrumbs while people are screaming for a reveal doesn't mean a thing. Gink backing him up looks sketchy as well.

If you look back, seems like he was breadcrumbing for quite a while back. "You know deep in your heart that I'm town" really? Would you be my prime suspect if so?

3 minutes ago, Truthiness said:

My "pre-game" vote came immediately following my Role PM, whatever foul Biggs wants to call. You know deep in your heart that I'm town. It's day one, so of course I'm gonna vote around.

Whatever Pod wants to say at this point doesn't matter to me. I don't believe it. My vote is staying put. Dripping breadcrumbs while people are screaming for a reveal doesn't mean a thing. Gink backing him up looks sketchy as well.

I agree about the doubt concerning Pod. Even when he was told he was gonna die he tried distracting attention to Mad and ovi. Furthermore, I agree that Gink's decision to defend him is a bit suspicious.

However, that does not absolve you of any doubts. You pushed very hard against Gink, then went from voting for him to voting with him. Seems a rather odd turnaround in opinion, and I was hoping you would be kind enough to provide an explanation. Saying you were joking doesn't quite cut it with me.

4 minutes ago, Truthiness said:

You know deep in your heart that I'm town

I dont think I have wronged you so far? how long will you keep this up?

2 minutes ago, GhostofNobodyInParticular said:

Even when he was told he was gonna die he tried distracting attention to Mad and ovi.

I highlighted two playerswho had ignored my requests for business earlier, one i have now heard from and believe has just the right amount of snakey about him and his secretive spice recipe.

The other has sincerely dissapointed me with his contribution so far

1 minute ago, PodRacer said:

I highlighted two playerswho had ignored my requests for business earlier, one i have now heard from and believe has just the right amount of snakey about him and his secretive spice recipe.

The other has sincerely dissapointed me with his contribution so far

An odd reason to suspect somebody though, that they didn't respond to what everybody assumed was flavor.

5 minutes ago, Truthiness said:

My "pre-game" vote came immediately following my Role PM, whatever foul Biggs wants to call. You know deep in your heart that I'm town. It's day one, so of course I'm gonna vote around.

Whatever Pod wants to say at this point doesn't matter to me. I don't believe it. My vote is staying put. Dripping breadcrumbs while people are screaming for a reveal doesn't mean a thing. Gink backing him up looks sketchy as well.

Gink reaction would look odd to me if the subtle claim, alien, was not have done the way it was and, more important, when he did!! Just after my first attempt to figuring out what the **** he was (unlyncher). He was actually correcting my guess.

I think Pod's role claim is true. However, not necessarily, his alignment claim. But I don't see the point, if scum, to correct people guesses and he tried before the cult leader stuff (Btw sorry for that, I really thought that has sense).

12 minutes ago, GhostofNobodyInParticular said:

However, that does not absolve you of any doubts. You pushed very hard against Gink, then went from voting for him to voting with him. Seems a rather odd turnaround in opinion, and I was hoping you would be kind enough to provide an explanation. Saying you were joking doesn't quite cut it with me.

I don't really have anything further to add and I'm probably about to go dark for a little bit. If you're going to hang me, don't feel obligated to wait for a further defense, because none will be forthcoming. I don't have a sexy role to reveal. I'm just a simple townie who thinks Gink and Pod are suspicious. If that gets me hanged, oh well.

Just now, Truthiness said:

I don't really have anything further to add and I'm probably about to go dark for a little bit. If you're going to hang me, don't feel obligated to wait for a further defense, because none will be forthcoming. I don't have a sexy role to reveal. I'm just a simple townie who thinks Gink and Pod are suspicious. If that gets me hanged, oh well.

::sigh:: Alas for the simple townie role! So easy to claim, so hard to prove, so useful to town!

I shall spare you for now, though your defense isn't the golden thing I was hoping for, and move on to Gink.

##unvote Truthiness

@Ginkapo, we've basically already got your defense from earlier, but have you anything further to add? Why go from attempting to discredit Pod to defending him?

how can i assure

9 minutes ago, GhostofNobodyInParticular said:

An odd reason to suspect somebody though, that they didn't respond to what everybody assumed was flavor

He was 1000% lynch train, without looking for reassurances even after i had offered him multiple opportunities to throw shade on himself

4 minutes ago, ovinomanc3r said:

I think Pod's role claim is true. However, not necessarily, his alignment claim. But I don't see the point, if scum, to correct people guesses and he tried before the cult leader stuff (Btw sorry for that, I really thought that has sense).

This is a good point though, he might very well be a scum roleblocker masquerading as town jailer. And keeping the facts straight on role is important for future days. We'd know fairly quick if he was a cult leader or not (I think?) but if he confirms jailer (likely roleblocker if scum) then he can stick around for possibly at least another day. He doesn't have to worry about being being suspected when he doesn't get nightkilled because most likely there's a doctor somewhere who will not want to roleclaim day 2. Not to mention, he delayed the reveal and cut down our time, subtly putting us in an accelerated mindset to get someone else dead.

All I'm saying is everyone seemed a little quick to unvote to me. His actions seem fishy even though I feel his demeanor reads mad town.