2 hours ago, JJs Juggernaut said:

Yal are idiots...Obviously you all hammered truthiness before I could even vote (you did it during the middle of the day again). Anyone voting for me is wasting time, and also very potentially scummy. I've got a job to do, and I hate that I somehow need all your cooperation to do it.

Also GNiPs, you say I took no action against Mad or Gink for not claiming, yet currently my vote is on Mad....

It's hard to push anything, no matter your role, when you are limited with the amount of posting you can do. I chose to vote on Gink for more reasons of spite and slight suspicious. I hoped either the town would join, or we would find another target who I could join in on latter...and we did with Truthiness, but as previously stated, I didn't even get a chance.

I need to go to work now, I doubt I'll have time like yesterday to check the thread.

I get that you dont post often. Why does that prevent you from putting together a case? If you are so against me then why no case? Its not like I have not posted enough, plenty of material for you.

2 hours ago, JJs Juggernaut said:

One last note before I leave. I completely believe GNiPs claim. Mine specifically mentions being hired by the Station Owner to hunt scum on his station. Up until he claimed, I assumed that it was the deceased Biggs.

Relevance? Nobody is suggesting otherwise. Why this post if you havent got much time?

@GNips. Depends when I get it I suppose. I was hoping to get it today and use today.

3 minutes ago, Ginkapo said:

@GNips. Depends when I get it I suppose. I was hoping to get it today and use today.

As in day-action? Anyways, I get what you mean.

I also agree JJ is suspicious. But I was hoping that he could be proved one way or the other tonight though. . . but I guess that applies to anybody, eh?

Just now, GhostofNobodyInParticular said:

I also agree JJ is suspicious. But I was hoping that he could be proved one way or the other tonight though. . . but I guess that applies to anybody, eh?

How could it be proved? Only Vis has claimed to be able, and maybe me or Mad.

Can always no lynch and let Vis do his thing, but that hardly seems like your best course of action. Bike can only protect one of you.

2 minutes ago, Ginkapo said:

How could it be proved? Only Vis has claimed to be able, and maybe me or Mad.

Can always no lynch and let Vis do his thing, but that hardly seems like your best course of action. Bike can only protect one of you.

And the problem there is if bike protects GNiP, Vis is unprotected, right? Wouldn't it be better to hammer one of the suspects? I just don't know if no lynch is best for the town, esp if there is more than one killer as Mad seems to think.

Just now, Ginkapo said:

How could it be proved? Only Vis has claimed to be able, and maybe me or Mad.

Can always no lynch and let Vis do his thing, but that hardly seems like your best course of action. Bike can only protect one of you.

I was thinking of Vis doing his thing, and having Bike choose randomly. That way, they wouldn't know which of us did anything, and could choose wrong.

I cannot kill as part of my ability, nor do I have any items which confer such an ability on me.

4 minutes ago, Caldias said:

And the problem there is if bike protects GNiP, Vis is unprotected, right? Wouldn't it be better to hammer one of the suspects? I just don't know if no lynch is best for the town, esp if there is more than one killer as Mad seems to think.

Yeah, I think we should lynch somebody, but I don't know who.

8 minutes ago, GhostofNobodyInParticular said:

Yeah, I think we should lynch somebody, but I don't know who.

Well, where are you leaning? Whats your most pressing concern at the moment?

Cal, Gink, and JJ.

Gink may investigate, JJ could be aligned with us, so. . . sorry Dude. . .

##vote Caldias. . .

I'm going to trade with @Ginkapo tonight (I don't have a day action). I'd like to keep him round long enough

Caldias was going to use his customs agent ability on me, confiscating my spice. That's another thing that can be confirmed overnight. I'd rather not lynch him for that reason.

JJ had this town vibe going for him, but my scum radar has been really off this game. If it comes to it, I'm ok with a lynch on him, but...i dunno.

GNIP, is that your hammer ability or a regular vote?

3 minutes ago, Onidsen said:

I'm going to trade with @Ginkapo tonight (I don't have a day action). I'd like to keep him round long enough

Caldias was going to use his customs agent ability on me, confiscating my spice. That's another thing that can be confirmed overnight. I'd rather not lynch him for that reason.

JJ had this town vibe going for him, but my scum radar has been really off this game. If it comes to it, I'm ok with a lynch on him, but...i dunno.

GNIP, is that your hammer ability or a regular vote?

Regular.

So you mean that over night we can confirm JJ, Cal, and Gink?

Then we might as well kill Mad, he's the only one left!

9 players capable of voting = 5 to hammer:

1. @GhostofNobodyInParticular -
2. @Madaghmire - (2) Onidsen, JJs Juggernaut
3. @Ginkapo -
4. @Visovics -
5. @CaribbeanNinja -
6. @Caldias - (2) - Visovics, GhostofNobodyInParticular
7. @Onidsen -
8. @Bike Stunts -
9. @JJs Juggernaut - (3) - Ginkapo, Caribbean Ninja, Madaghmire
10. No Lynch -

1 minute ago, GhostofNobodyInParticular said:

Regular.

So you mean that over night we can confirm JJ, Cal, and Gink?

Then we might as well kill Mad, he's the only one left!

I don't think JJ's role seemed very verifiable, but I'd also hate to hammer him while he's unable to respond, which is why I pulled back.

1 minute ago, Caldias said:

I don't think JJ's role seemed very verifiable, but I'd also hate to hammer him while he's unable to respond, which is why I pulled back.

Well the thing is, if Vis visits him, and he doesn't die, he's OK.

We could just go a no-lynch, let everybody do their actions, and then:

1) CNinja is confirmed
2) Bike is Confirmed
3) Cal is confirmed
4) Gink is confirmed
5) I am confirmed
6) Oni is confirmed
7) JJ is confirmed
8) Vis may be confirmed

9) Mad isn't confirmed

That narrows it down a lot. . . what do you guys say? Even if somebody is lying, trades clear Cal, Oni, and Gink, so JJ, Vis, and Mad are the ones who have to be visited.

You would regret killing me, is it claim or die ghost?

I say you pick one and just turbo hammer. I don't even care if it's me, honestly. Either way you're progressing toward something.

7 minutes ago, Caldias said:

I say you pick one and just turbo hammer. I don't even care if it's me, honestly. Either way you're progressing toward something.

I think we should be slightly more careful on the use of the turbo-hammer

I can also visit Mad at night to see if he survives, he is as verifiable as JJ. Now Caldias can only be confirmed in D4 if I understand his ability right. Comes quite useful if that is the amount of time you needed to win the game, and also had Ovi as the target for your inspection at night, would come useful if a watcher stepped forward. I'm really leaning towards Caldias here

Just now, Visovics said:

I can also visit Mad at night to see if he survives, he is as verifiable as JJ. Now Caldias' ability can only be confirmed in D4 if I understand his ability right. Comes quite useful if that is the amount of time you needed to win the game, and also had Ovi as the target for your inspection at night, would come useful if a watcher stepped forward. I'm really leaning towards Caldias here

I hate typing on the phone, sorry for the weird quote post, I was correcting it to say "Caldias' ability" on the first lines

4 minutes ago, Visovics said:

I can also visit Mad at night to see if he survives, he is as verifiable as JJ. Now Caldias can only be confirmed in D4 if I understand his ability right. Comes quite useful if that is the amount of time you needed to win the game, and also had Ovi as the target for your inspection at night, would come useful if a watcher stepped forward. I'm really leaning towards Caldias here

I feel confident that Cal isnt a watcher.

27 minutes ago, Madaghmire said:

You would regret killing me, is it claim or die ghost?

Only if we don't go for a no-lynch, I guess. . . Which seems likely.

21 minutes ago, Visovics said:

I think we should be slightly more careful on the use of the turbo-hammer

My point being we're not really progressing. I do think maybe it is worth seeing if you can get Mad or Gink to claim, but I don't see any further useful information forthcoming this day.

2 minutes ago, Caldias said:

My point being we're not really progressing. I do think maybe it is worth seeing if you can get Mad or Gink to claim, but I don't see any further useful information forthcoming this day.

Neither do I. . .

Guys? Any intent on claiming?

11 minutes ago, GhostofNobodyInParticular said:

Neither do I. . .

Guys? Any intent on claiming?

I mean, if its that or die then I have no choice. I can't fulfill my condition dead.