=)

I haven't had it played against me yet, but are we ready for round 2 of the great nerfing?

Attanni, Fenn Rau and jumps are still wayyy too dominant.

-

Attanni = 2 pts

Fenn Rau +1 pt, and/or only gets attacking and def bonus at R1.

Scout and Manaroo + 3 pts AND lose EPT slot. Dengar + 1 point, Tel no change.

(Would be nice to have Palp R3 range limit, revert nerf.

And Defenders evade is assigned, not action)

Cad Bang, eh?

Guess we're adopting that

Will contribute morrow. Got SC then. Flying maximum bomb jank

I think Attani should be a unique card, personally. It's just too effective.

I've been wrecked by Scurrgs twice now (on Vassal) and it was a fun experience - they're not powerful the way the JM5K is.

Also, I think all right turns and banks on scouts being red would go a long way towards bringing them back to being reasonable.

5 minutes ago, Astech said:

I think Attani should be a unique card, personally. It's just too effective.

So you want it to be literally a wasted point. Or do you have a rewording that might make it being unique usable?

3 minutes ago, GrogEgrog said:

So you want it to be literally a wasted point. Or do you have a rewording that might make it being unique usable?

Just a wasted point. If you're flying more than 2 sum ships currently, it's pretty foolish not to take attanni on them, regardless of the ships themselves. It's an automatic upgrade. I'd prefer it were removed from the game, but errata making it a unique card is a nice compromise...

1 hour ago, Astech said:

Just a wasted point. If you're flying more than 2 sum ships currently, it's pretty foolish not to take attanni on them, regardless of the ships themselves. It's an automatic upgrade. I'd prefer it were removed from the game, but errata making it a unique card is a nice compromise...

How could it be unique? It needs to be used on at least two ships to work. I don't see them ever changing a card to make it objectively useless.

6 minutes ago, pkreynolds said:

How could it be unique? It needs to be used on at least two ships to work. I don't see them ever changing a card to make it objectively useless.

Pretty sure he is joking. But to make it unique and still roughly do the same thing you'd have to reword it to something like "when a friendly ship at range X receives a focus or evade token, you also get a token if you don't already one"

Selfnessless.

19 minutes ago, piznit said:

Pretty sure he is joking. But to make it unique and still roughly do the same thing you'd have to reword it to something like "when a friendly ship at range X receives a focus or evade token, you also get a token if you don't already one"

That sounds more "Scummy". Why are these selfish mercenaries working together so well? Don't they want the other Mercs to die at the last minute to increase their own payout?

3 hours ago, Astech said:

Just a wasted point. If you're flying more than 2 sum ships currently, it's pretty foolish not to take attanni on them, regardless of the ships themselves. It's an automatic upgrade. I'd prefer it were removed from the game, but errata making it a unique card is a nice compromise...

Better shtt posting than I could ever imagine.

Update:

Sd in progresz

Emon, nym stuffed up the,*** with upgrades and carryng cad. Emon falls way too quickly for the 55 i threw on him, but holy **** is this hilarious

Nym: vi, havoc, genius, fcs, autoblaster, homing, extras, chips

Emon: slave 1, extras, cad,clusters und clusters, homings, chips and stims

Attani just needs errata at the end with "unless you are already stressed"

Means you can't put focus on all your ships if just one does a green in the corner

My recommendation for Attanni fix would be to change the wording to what it always should have been - triggering with Manaroo getting a focus (or giving Manaroo a focus if you gain one).

The Attanni mindlink is her people's thing in the fluff and it's not a prolific thing through out the Galaxy.

Manaroo's ability works OK with non linked lists then, and still synergizes with mindlink when she is used with them.

But that will bring back paratanni, you say... Not if mindlink is unique to just one ship plus Manny.

That's the best I got as a scum player for a suggestion that tones it down while adding it back into it's own fluff.

20 hours ago, Astech said:

I think Attani should be a unique card, personally. It's just too effective.

...

20 hours ago, GrogEgrog said:

So you want it to be literally a wasted point. Or do you have a rewording that might make it being unique usable?

19 hours ago, Astech said:

Just a wasted point...

So you don't like scum, I have the perfect solution for you, sell your collection and invest in Armada, there is no Scum in Armada.

20 minutes ago, Marinealver said:

So you don't like scum, I have the perfect solution for you, sell your collection and invest in Armada, there is no Scum in Armada.

What makes you think I don't like scum?

I was merely pointing out how making Mindlink unique makes it useless.

Don't assume @Marinealver as you've assumed wrong.

18 hours ago, Blail Blerg said:

Selfnessless.

Selfishnessless

35 minutes ago, Marinealver said:

So you don't like scum, I have the perfect solution for you, sell your collection and invest in Armada, there is no Scum in Armada.

Ehhhh...dengar is still REALLY good too

Just in an entirelydifferent way (hes squadron support)

I play only scum and I hate Attanni too.

2 hours ago, GrogEgrog said:

What makes you think I don't like scum?

I was merely pointing out how making Mindlink unique makes it useless.

Don't assume @Marinealver as you've assumed wrong.

That's the problem with remote communications, so much of the message gets lost to include inflection and tone. That's why I usually attach an emote to imply my post was sarcastic.

This works best I'd observed ->

1 hour ago, Marinealver said:

That's the problem with remote communications, so much of the message gets lost to include inflection and tone. That's why I usually attach an emote to imply my post was sarcastic.

This works best I'd observed ->

There wasn't much to lose.

Not one **** thing about my post implied I didn't like scum. You put your own spin on it. That's on you.

And since you need an emoji for tone ?

Yall talkin bout attani and jumpmasterzzz are so behind the meta it's a hoot.

Don't choo know, PS10 Imperial crooze missile alpha strike is the new hotness.

Poetensity is ta only one who lives.

18 hours ago, GrogEgrog said:

There wasn't much to lose.

Not one **** thing about my post implied I didn't like scum. You put your own spin on it. That's on you.

And since you need an emoji for tone ?

Okay, so you were not sarcastic at all.

Then I have assumed nothing, good thing you are not a designer, making a card worthless just because you do not like it is a thoughtless thing to say.

Seriously can you imagine someone back when scum first came out saying they should make IG-2000 unique because they don't like bro-bots.

Marinealver was obviously responding to pkreynolds, not you GrogErog (and then he forgot he was responding to pkreynolds).

8 hours ago, Calibri Garamond said:

Marinealver was obviously responding to pkreynolds, not you GrogErog (and then he forgot he was responding to pkreynolds).

Yeah I'm catching that.

8 hours ago, Marinealver said:

Okay, so you were not sarcastic at all.

Then I have assumed nothing, good thing you are not a designer, making a card worthless just because you do not like it is a thoughtless thing to say.

Seriously can you imagine someone back when scum first came out saying they should make IG-2000 unique because they don't like bro-bots.

You realize I'm not the one who wanted to make it unique right? Seriously. I've never once called for an attani nerf of any sort. Go through my post history. It's short.

1 hour ago, GrogEgrog said:

Yeah I'm catching that.

You realize I'm not the one who wanted to make it unique right? Seriously. I've never once called for an attani nerf of any sort. Go through my post history. It's short.

okay, so can we all admit this was just one big misunderstanding then.