7 hours ago, jonboyjon1990 said:

Huh? @Xargonaut asked me what I meant by 'hard errata'

the way I see it there's:

- 'soft errata' which is simple word tweaking, but the functionality of the card remains largely similar to original wording. This is commonly seen in X-Wing and Armada. And the 'new' versions of the cards aren't provided - in reprint of packs or otherwise.

- 'hard errata' which is larger changes to wording, or in the case of Imperial Assault, a complete change in the wording/functionality of the card. These new cards were made available.

Your first example isn't really errata. It is merely a clarification on the intent of the card. Do you have an example where they change the wording on a card but it doesn't change how it works?

FFG hasn't made all of their changes made available in print, but they have made some (the Imperial Assault cards, for example). So I think the bottom line is that we can't really make a judgement either way. Strange discussion, too, since not only has nothing been errata'd, I don't really see anything that needs it.