Well, if no one else is going to do it...

##vote @Onidsen

Having folks explain their silence is kinda my MO....

I'm looking at you next @Visovics ....

My thoughts are close to Madaghmire's ones.

IMO, not being sure about the number of republicans, I think at least one played the joke vote game on me and at least another kept himself safe far away from that wagon.

Not too much to add yet.

14 minutes ago, moodswing5537 said:

Well, if no one else is going to do it...

##vote @Onidsen

Having folks explain their silence is kinda my MO....

I'm looking at you next @Visovics ....

Sorry, school. I'm back

Right now I'm mostly suspecting Norell on that L-2. For some reason my guts tell me CNinja and Mad are among that terrorist rebel scum, but no real reason.

I haven't got much of a clear image, but as I said, Norell is the most suspect-looking. I'll wait for Onidsen to speak up to make up my mind about him

37 minutes ago, Madaghmire said:

Wait I think our signals are crossed. I was saying norells vote was very mild scum tell that didnt bother me much beyond that I haven't seen much else that concerns me.

You think Truth displayed a tell?

Yeah, I'm a little confused here. Are you saying me adopting Bigg's list is a tell somehow? That's just me trying to get better at this and trying to drive conversation.

@Onidsen get in here and speak up. I see you lurking without saying anything

Man, long dry spells in this one.

7 minutes ago, Truthiness said:

Man, long dry spells in this one.

Yeah folks be sitting back waitin'. But we can't learn much this way, definetely plays to mafia advantage if we dont start chatting it up some.

1 hour ago, Madaghmire said:

Wait I think our signals are crossed. I was saying norells vote was very mild scum tell that didnt bother me much beyond that I haven't seen much else that concerns me.

You think Truth displayed a tell?

Yup. I think a lot of times the mafia will try to bait us into voting...Now, that being said, I agree with you that @Norell is the most suspicious so far:

1. voted to put Ovi at -2.

2. Previously was always against a Day 1 vote. (This is REALLY suspicious to me.)

For those reasons, I think he is the most suspicious.

The reason I find Truth suspicious is that he's driving it. That could also be a solid town play, but it just reads a little suspicious to me. Then he goes and adds the list. Again, could be just investigating/prodding, but could also be a scum tell.

19 minutes ago, Truthiness said:

Man, long dry spells in this one.

I don't know, it always seems like Day 1 is slow. We still have a long way to go.

11 minutes ago, Truthiness said:

Man, long dry spells in this one.

2 minutes ago, Madaghmire said:

Yeah folks be sitting back waitin'. But we can't learn much this way, definetely plays to mafia advantage if we dont start chatting it up some.

Yes. Not sure if I should push on Truthiness/Norell or the silent people...

All the "real" moved I see were:

- Norell putting me at h-2

- Truthiness jumping into Norell's "trap".

- Moodswing deflecting the pursuing over Norell and Truthiness to Onidsen.

Nothing too incriminating so I am going to push following the time line.

## vote Norell

10 minutes ago, Madaghmire said:

Yeah folks be sitting back waitin'. But we can't learn much this way, definetely plays to mafia advantage if we dont start chatting it up some.

Yeah, we need some more action going, we got less than a day left

##Vote Norell

Most suspicious looking,put Ovi in an L-2 early, but your comment about there being 2 is the one that worries me. You said we are almost certain there are 2 like the Sith , BUT THERE WERE 3 SITH! And Gink said the game is not susceptible to mass claim, which leads me to believe that there are in fact 3, and I have the impression you are trying to mislead us

10 minutes ago, Madaghmire said:

Yeah folks be sitting back waitin'. But we can't learn much this way, definetely plays to mafia advantage if we dont start chatting it up some.

I've been chatty...too chatty. I'm such a noob. BTW, I'm at work for the next 5 hours but I'll try to keep up.

##unvote Norell

Ninja'd by the sheep, still gonna wait a bit more for the L-2

Just now, Admiral WigT said:

I've been chatty...too chatty. I'm such a noob. BTW, I'm at work for the next 5 hours but I'll try to keep up.

Everybodys new once

On 6/26/2017 at 10:40 AM, Ginkapo said:

Mod note: this game is not susceptible to mass claim.

What does this mean exactly?

I'm not against voting norell if thats where the votes go, but I'd really like to hear from Oni.

2 minutes ago, CaribbeanNinja said:

What does this mean exactly?

This is what bothers me. Last 2 games we thought there were 2 mafia, and lynched one in D1, and mass claimed D2 to see who had the less believable, and so this game being like so, I think we are at 3 suspects, which is rather weird out of 9, but Nippy liking the 12 version tells how there is some crazy stuff added, so why not this one?

Silence makes me suspicious. I'm watching very carefully.

22 minutes ago, CaribbeanNinja said:

Yup. I think a lot of times the mafia will try to bait us into voting...Now, that being said, I agree with you that @Norell is the most suspicious so far:

1. voted to put Ovi at -2.

2. Previously was always against a Day 1 vote. (This is REALLY suspicious to me.)

For those reasons, I think he is the most suspicious.

The reason I find Truth suspicious is that he's driving it. That could also be a solid town play, but it just reads a little suspicious to me. Then he goes and adds the list. Again, could be just investigating/prodding, but could also be a scum tell.

1. I don't get why hitting someone to L-2 makes me instantly suspicious. There should be two more people to vote to kill that person, I really don't see why does have anyone to freak out.

2. So you deny me the right of self development. There was so much talking and so many analyses about day 1 lynch... Couldn't I just change my opinion and/or become better in the game?

My main suspect is still @Truthiness because as Cninja said, he's pretty much running the game right now. He started it with ovi and jumped on my bait right away. Mad seems suspicious too because this "I'm gladly lynching anyone of the others are willing to" attitude.

37 minutes ago, ovinomanc3r said:

Yes. Not sure if I should push on Truthiness/Norell or the silent people...

All the "real" moved I see were:

- Norell putting me at h-2

- Truthiness jumping into Norell's "trap".

- Moodswing deflecting the pursuing over Norell and Truthiness to Onidsen.

Nothing too incriminating so I am going to push following the time line.

## vote Norell

Not a deflection, on purpose anyway, more of an apb for a silent player. I am watching responses to see what shakes down. (plus, I'm at work so having to split my attention...)

9 minutes ago, Norell said:

My main suspect is still @Truthiness because as Cninja said, he's pretty much running the game right now.

Gink ran the game last time, he was as town as anyone else with paranoia.

JJ ran Mos Erdru, he was town and was also lynched for it (In a 3 hour day! This was amazing to watch from the mafia cabinet)

1 hour ago, CaribbeanNinja said:

Previously was always against a Day 1 vote. (This is REALLY suspicious to me.)

I was pretty vocal in my change of heart after Killigains:

If you read through the notes from the last game, I was kind of in awe of Gink and Biggs. As such, I've come around to day one activities. Read that as you will. Biggs made lists both when he was Scum and when he was loyal. It's a good tool.

29 minutes ago, Norell said:

1. I don't get why hitting someone to L-2 makes me instantly suspicious. There should be two more people to vote to kill that person, I really don't see why does have anyone to freak out.

2. So you deny me the right of self development. There was so much talking and so many analyses about day 1 lynch... Couldn't I just change my opinion and/or become better in the game?

My main suspect is still @Truthiness because as Cninja said, he's pretty much running the game right now. He started it with ovi and jumped on my bait right away. Mad seems suspicious too because this "I'm gladly lynching anyone of the others are willing to" attitude.

Thats pretty far from what I said.

4 minutes ago, Truthiness said:

I was pretty vocal in my change of heart after Killigains:

I wasn't accusing you...Norell doesn't have any history of this change of heart. I'm simply pointing out the lack of consistency.

37 minutes ago, Norell said:

My main suspect is still @Truthiness because as Cninja said, he's pretty much running the game right now. He started it with ovi and jumped on my bait right away. Mad seems suspicious too because this "I'm gladly lynching anyone of the others are willing to" attitude.

I was actually second on Ovi. And my exact words were "let's see what a little pressure done." Then you put him at -2. So let's review. Mad says at the get go "LOL JOKE VOTE." I go, yeah sure, let's see what some pressure does. You then jump in and Vis calls you on it. You've now backpedaled, forgotten that Vis called you on it, and are claiming a "trap." I'm definitely not buying it. You got railroaded last time by circumstantial evidence. This time you're digging your own grave.

We still have plenty of time though. I don't think we should go past -2 on Norell right now, especially seeing as Onidsen has not said a word despite him having forum activity.