4 minutes ago, CaribbeanNinja said:

Yeah totally agree with this. @Norell you've got some 'splainin' to do.

Yup, this. Putting someone at -2 off a joke vote is pretty suspect. Easy for Scum to hide behind the "woe is me" defense.

##unvote ovinomanc3r

1 hour ago, Visovics said:

I think Mad was more of a joke, I'd be more worried at Norell's vote of putting you at -2 few hours in

Not a joke. But, yeah, random. Gotta start somewhere.

Btw, if Ovi is considered likely innocent by law of averages, Norell has to be guilty right? I mean, we string him up early every time, it has to work eventually!

Btw I don't actually buy that. As I said before, Gambler's Fallacy.

That having been said Nor, why put him in turbo range so early?

Okay, I'm back from work. What did I miss....jeez! Already L-2 on @ovinomanc3r a few hours in?!? I mean, we didn't even read him his rights....im getting some anti-wool vibes from you folks.....

Too quiet.

##vote Norell

Come explain putting someone at -2 so early.

@CaribbeanNinja Any thoughts? Pretty quiet over there other than noting the same problem with Norell.

Regarding @ovinomanc3r ...joke or no joke? And maybe @Norell got caught up in the moment?

I'm as eager to find the rebel scum as any other loyalist here, but I need more information before I cast my vote.

If there's one thing I've learned over the last few games is day one votes are like diapers: changed often and at the slightest whiff of odor.

38 minutes ago, Truthiness said:

If there's one thing I've learned over the last few games is day one votes are like diapers: changed often and at the slightest whiff of odor.

Roflmao.

1 hour ago, Truthiness said:

@CaribbeanNinja Any thoughts? Pretty quiet over there other than noting the same problem with Norell.

Not much going on here really. @Norell still using his D1 suspicious super-power. Always with that one the suspicion must be done...

It is REALLY suspicious when you remember that he has always been against day 1 lynchings.

10 hours ago, Visovics said:

out of EVERYONE, I'd say Ovi is the least likely to be due to the obvious statistics.

I'm townie third time in a row. Statistics in your face

And putting ovi L-2 so quickly? First of all, thr mafia would be stupid to vote him from here being too obvious (we can be fairly certain there are 2 of them, like Sith). Therefor they will vote someone else. Just watch who gets the next vote...

And second, last time I caught Biggs with the strategy of making deliberately an outrageously stupid vote and teasing him into jumping at me as the obvious target.

So let's see who was kind enough... Ah yeeesh...

#vote Truthiness

He is my prime suspect at the moment.

Truthi care to explain why you had the urge to vote me instantly when ovi was L-2? You could have just unvote him...

36 minutes ago, Norell said:

Truthi care to explain why you had the urge to vote me instantly when ovi was L-2? You could have just unvote him...

I did and then let to sit for a bit. I heard nothing, so I voted to get a response. You're a bit more defensive here than you've been in the past. Did I strike a nerve?

Yeah, obviously! I don't eant to be lynched at the beginning of the game again

17 minutes ago, Norell said:

Yeah, obviously! I don't eant to be lynched at the beginning of the game again

Oh don't be dramatic. We only got you on round 2 last time

Since we don't have Biggs or Gink, I'll try to lay out my threat list

High

None

Moderate

Norell- P ut ovi at -2 very quickly on a joke vote that was specifically advertised as a joke vote. Pretty defensive about it immediately following. He's also acted like this before and been innocent.

Low

Ovi- I mean, what are the odds of three in a row?

WigT- noncommittal, already gave us flavor information.

Mad- joke votes are jokes...for now

mood- not much input so far

Ninja- Jumped on norell pretty quick, but then again so did I.

Onidsen- quiet, too quiet

Visovics- sounded the alarm on the Ovi train.

Teddy Bear

It's the first day. You're ALL a little suspect

7 hours ago, Norell said:

I'm townie third time in a row. Statistics in your face

And putting ovi L-2 so quickly? First of all, thr mafia would be stupid to vote him from here being too obvious (we can be fairly certain there are 2 of them, like Sith). Therefor they will vote someone else. Just watch who gets the next vote...

7 hours ago, Norell said:

So let's see who was kind enough... Ah yeeesh...

#vote Truthiness

He is my prime suspect at the moment.

Well, by your explanation......

29 minutes ago, Truthiness said:

Onidsen- quiet, too quiet

Yes, very quiet indeed.

29 minutes ago, Truthiness said:

WigT- noncommittal, already gave us flavor information.

Are not poets usually against the status quo?

9 minutes ago, ovinomanc3r said:

Are not poets usually against the status quo?

Haha...normally I would say yes, but not in this case. Have you not read my "Ode to Nowhere Special?" I'm loyal to my last breath.

So, looking at the votes so far;

Mine is still on ovi for lack of a better place to put it, but unless he says something he shouldn't somewhere I imagine I'll be placing it somewhere else as daylight draws to a close

Ovi has a retaliatory vote on me, nothing suspicious there.

Truth hits norell for putting vote three on Ovi so early. Norells actions are mildly suspicious, and I think the closest thing we have to a scum tell in the game so far. That said, he is right when he implies that a scum turbo kill there would have been a net win for the town. I'm not overly concerned by the action beyond that its the closest thing we have so far.

Norell retaliatory vote on truth. Which is fine. Retaliatory votes day one dont say much to me.

I feel pretty good about Visovics and Truth in this one. And also wigT, I guess,l. (although my brother next time try to avoid giving so much out so early. It clears you but risks handing information to the scum.)

I'd like to see a bit more from Oni, Moodswing and the ninja sipping umbrella drinks in the corner.

for now, I'm going to

##unvote ovinomanc3r

7 minutes ago, Madaghmire said:

Truth hits norell for putting vote three on Ovi so early. Norells actions are mildly suspicious, and I think the closest thing we have to a scum tell in the game so far. That said, he is right when he implies that a scum turbo kill there would have been a net win for the town. I'm not overly concerned by the action beyond that its the closest thing we have so far.

Yeah...and when you add the "list" it is a big tell in my book.

8 minutes ago, Madaghmire said:

ninja sipping umbrella drinks in the corner.

"Sipping drinks? Why yes, It's my primary function, sir. I am well versed in all the drinks..."

Just now, CaribbeanNinja said:

Yeah...and when you add the "list" it is a big tell in my book.

"Sipping drinks? Why yes, It's my primary function, sir. I am well versed in all the drinks..."

This is true. I have witnessed this man's impressive liquor cabinet....

28 minutes ago, CaribbeanNinja said:

Yeah...and when you add the "list" it is a big tell in my book.

Wait I think our signals are crossed. I was saying norells vote was very mild scum tell that didnt bother me much beyond that I haven't seen much else that concerns me.

You think Truth displayed a tell?