ok, An introduction to the joke vote phase.
Everyone needs to start throwing votes around for "reasons". By doing this it starts to naturally build pressure in the game and gives us talking points.
ok, An introduction to the joke vote phase.
Everyone needs to start throwing votes around for "reasons". By doing this it starts to naturally build pressure in the game and gives us talking points.
3 minutes ago, Ginkapo said:ok, An introduction to the joke vote phase.
Everyone needs to start throwing votes around for "reasons". By doing this it starts to naturally build pressure in the game and gives us talking points.
You mean like:
##vote Ginkapo
'cause he's teaching us how to play (and thus may misguide us)?
"Reasons" I read to be 'no particular reason'. It is after all a 'joke vote'. . .
1 minute ago, GhostofNobodyInParticular said:You mean like:
##vote Ginkapo
'cause he's teaching us how to play (and thus may misguide us)?
![]()
"Reasons" I read to be 'no particular reason'. It is after all a 'joke vote'. . .
Something more like
##vote Madaghmire
he seems to be real hasty here to push, we got quite a long time to let people make mistakes
Also, the next person that complains about a power role being forced to claim Turn 1 for being a scummy, scummy town (or actual scum and weaseling out of a vote) is volunteering to be voted in their place.
Also ##vote GhostofNobodyInParticular
Don't policy vote quality / experienced players, no matter how salty they are. That's a scum move.
You're not scum... are you?
45 hours remaining
7 to hammer
The Living:
@Madaghmire (1) Visovics
@Ginkapo (1) GNiP
@BiggsIRL (1) Oni
@GhostofNobodyInParticular (1) Biggs
@moodswing5537 (1) Gink
Truth is gonna have a trauma of D1 votes after that xD
22 minutes ago, BiggsIRL said:Also ##vote GhostofNobodyInParticular
Don't policy vote quality / experienced players, no matter how salty they are. That's a scum move.
You're not scum... are you?
Of course I'm not scum. I did say it was a joke vote. I would have been sincerely surprised had anyone actually agreed with it. Granted, Mafia Wiki does recommend lynching experienced players first, but I do not subscribe to such an opinion, preferring instead to depend upon their wisdom as long as possible.
If it helps:
##unvote Ginkapo
I thought I had made it obvious, what with the '
' and all. At this stage, I have no idea whom to vote for.
One thing I know, it's that scum are quick to back off a vote when challenged, especially if it is on their scum buddy. @Ginkapo how do you feel knowing your scum friend @GhostofNobodyInParticular ratted the two of you out by his wishy-washy voting record!?
25 minutes ago, Truthiness said:45 hours remaining
7 to hammer
The Living:
@Madaghmire (1) Visovics
@Ginkapo (1) GNiP
@BiggsIRL (1) Oni
@GhostofNobodyInParticular (1) Biggs
@moodswing5537 (1) Gink
Sheesh, that's scattered. . . I think joke voting is actually hurting us Gink, by spreading pressure around too far without enough focus. With almost half our votes spread among 5 players, not 1 of them can take such a vote seriously. Especially when you specifically asked us to joke vote. It's the same as openly stating 'We don't need to lynch day 1, but lets say we are'.
Paranoid; that's what town should be during joke vote time. Scum love joke vote time. They use it to gain town cred. That's why we need to all act as scummy as possible so the people that look the most town are revealed for who they are! Scum!
##unvote Ghost
Let's keep some type of pressure on our only "suspects" up to date
##unvote Madaghmire
##vote ginkapo
2 minutes ago, GhostofNobodyInParticular said:Sheesh, that's scattered. . . I think joke voting is actually hurting us Gink, by spreading pressure around too far without enough focus. With almost half our votes spread among 5 players, not 1 of them can take such a vote seriously. Especially when you specifically asked us to joke vote. It's the same as openly stating 'We don't need to lynch day 1, but lets say we are'.
Gun shots fired! Though that's not the point of joke voting period. We still have a LONG time to go, and in all seriousness this little bit does let us figure out some things, even if a lot of it is goofyness.
There is benefit to all this. I have two lines of reasoning to pursue so far. I am still trying to refrain from pushing things so players cant hide.
Right well, I'm off to bed now. G'Night all!
Let's keep some type of pressure on our only "suspects" up to date
##unvote Madaghmire
##vote ginkapo
Ownership of votes is crucial here. Often we'll see scum do something try try and influence the vote on someone coming out of the joke vote period. Like I did in the last game with Norrel, even though I didn't vote until late, I tried to get people onboard a serious lynch while trying to build up town cred. We can look for people doing the same.
Oh crap my internet is SO bad right now
See you guys in the morning, don't lynch me overnight
8 minutes ago, BiggsIRL said:One thing I know, it's that scum are quick to back off a vote when challenged, especially if it is on their scum buddy. @Ginkapo how do you feel knowing your scum friend @GhostofNobodyInParticular ratted the two of you out by his wishy-washy voting record!?
One thing I know, is don't urinate on an electric fence. One other thing is that I agree with GNiP...this voting is awfully spread out. And Biggs, I do vote for experienced players. Makes em think....
But I'm gonna hold off until I see what happens to @Ginkapo with two votes.....
You people and your voting hijinks...
44 hours remaining
7 to hammer
The Living:
@Ginkapo (1) Visovics
@BiggsIRL (1) Oni
@moodswing5537 (1) Gink
The Dead:
Nvm - apparently Gink has only one vote. In which case, pressure is worthwhile.
##unvote Biggs
##vote Ginkapo
54 minutes ago, Onidsen said:Nvm - apparently Gink has only one vote. In which case, pressure is worthwhile.
##unvote Biggs
##vote Ginkapo
Gonna have to keep it on him for a bit. I'd bet he is asleep. In case he hasn't... Hey @Ginkapo !
#role confirmed. Also DAMNIT truthi! You are ******* ending the day in the middle of the afternoon again....I'm literally going to miss the most important hours of every round. Some people have jobs that keep them from checking on forums in the afternoons....
Anyway, just getting caught up on everything now. I'll give thoughts soon, though the only thing that has stuck out to me currently as suspicious was GNiP's recommendation of no hammer day 1....we know how that has gone...
If Gink is town, his experience makes him a valuable resource. I'd rather not sacrifice him on the altar of applied pressure. The same would go for Odinsen, or Biggs. I'll want more to go on before killing players who could be valuable as vanilla town.
I'll throw a vote moodswing's way tho. No reason we can't apply pressure in two places at once.
##vote moodswing5537