3 hours ago, Kuni Katsuyoshi said:please elaborate
With tremendous pleasure. ![]()
Let's take the example that you quoted earlier in this thread:
5 hours ago, Kuni Katsuyoshi said:AND parts of Leadership were banned as heretical (I have this strange feeling we've had this conversation before)
Leadership is a deeply pragmatic, deeply sensible book. It explains how to win wars, emphasising both the minimisation of casualties and the avoidance of collateral damage. It also stresses that a warrior needs to be more than just a killer, giving opinions on being a rounded human being and on using diplomacy and nonviolence wherever possible.
Certain parts of Leadership explain that it can be necessary to utilise deception and other underhanded methods on the battlefield. It explains that these methods may seem dishonourable, but can be worth it if they're used for a worthy cause (and if you aren't fighting for a worthy cause, why are you fighting at all?)
It is, in short, a sensible book full of good ideas. The fact that it was originally written by a deity is a nice addition.
As you remind us, parts of this book were banned. This means that at some point, some leader said to themselves, "These passages teach us how to be victorious and humanitarian via the application of intelligence; however, they contradict the inflexibility of our warrior code. This inflexibility is more important to us than victory, humanitarianism or even the will of a deity; therefore we must ban these passages."
1. How did this person get to be in charge of anything?
2. Why is anyone following this person?
3. How has anything commanded by such people managed to survive?