4 minutes ago, GhostofNobodyInParticular said:I was referring to Biggs.
Oh sorry, my mistake.
4 minutes ago, GhostofNobodyInParticular said:I was referring to Biggs.
Oh sorry, my mistake.
3 minutes ago, Truthiness said:Huh?
You never directly responded to my comment about how odd your statement there was. "Are you brave enough?" Like you know voting for him would be a bad idea. Or you want us to think voting for him would be a bad idea.
4 minutes ago, GhostofNobodyInParticular said:How do you link specific comments?
Upper right corner of the post there is a "share" icon.
3 minutes ago, BiggsIRL said:You never directly responded to my comment about how odd your statement there was. "Are you brave enough?" Like you know voting for him would be a bad idea. Or you want us to think voting for him would be a bad idea.
Upper right corner of the post there is a "share" icon.
Thanks! As a minor defense of Truthiness, I'll offer the alternative option of: 'Hammer is dangerous, thus anyone hammering is suspicious.'
However, I must comment that that would imply that the sayer of that argument would know that the hammered is somebody you wouldn't want to hammer. After all, if the hammered was scum, the hammerers wouldn't be held in such suspicion, unless there was clearly no other hammer candidates, implying that they may have done it to look good. However, in Day 1, I'm not sure how applicable that argument is.
I'm still waiting to hear from @JJs Juggernaut , and like I said, I'm ready to Day 1 lynch either @Norell or Biggs.
I will say this though guys, I might be "nauseatingly neutral" but I have an incredibly bad feeling about @BiggsIRL right now.
Norell has given us nothing other than the fact that he has "stellar bazonkas."
Biggs has given us a lot of fluff and a nudge nudge wink wink that he could be a power role. ( definite scum move )
4 minutes ago, BiggsIRL said:You never directly responded to my comment about how odd your statement there was. "Are you brave enough?" Like you know voting for him would be a bad idea. Or you want us to think voting for him would be a bad idea.
As I already explained, I was daring someone to pull the trigger because I consider day one votes on hammers to be extremely suspect. If you're in that hammer vote, you are suspect in my book (unless of course you magically hit a Scum, in which case I will happily grovel at your all knowing prowess) Interesting that you were so adamant that we need a day one hammer, but are now reluctant to pull the trigger now that I'm daring you to do so.
17 minutes ago, CaribbeanNinja said:"stellar bazonkas"
What the hell is that?
6 hours ago, Norell said:And finally in character: 'You don't want to kill someone with THESE, do you?' she said slowly caressing through her barely covered body and stellar bazonkas.
Just now, Visovics said:What the hell is that?
boobies
2 minutes ago, CaribbeanNinja said:
boobies
Oh, I had missed his post
Just under four hours left. Vote count hasnt changed.
1 hour ago, BiggsIRL said:Biggs’ Big Scum List
Norell - Set a trap to bait town into voting for him?
Again, he's trying to misinterpret what I say. I exactly said that the SCUM would be the one who jump at me. Just as he did
Also we should try to write more in character. I can't be the only one who got a hilarious character description in the PM
2 minutes ago, Norell said:Also we should try to write more in character. I can't be the only one who got a hilarious character description in the PM
![]()
I like small and evasive insects, so not exactly the most interesting character
1 hour ago, CaribbeanNinja said:Biggs has given us a lot of fluff and a nudge nudge wink wink that he could be a power role. ( definite scum move )
I am "very easy... on the eyes" and I " cannot stand to let anyone have fun without me". I bet I'm a twi-lek too! A blue one for sure
3 minutes ago, Norell said:Again, he's trying to misinterpret what I say. I exactly said that the SCUM would be the one who jump at me. Just as he did
![]()
I missed here. Did you vote randomly to make traitors (how many times I wrote scum and had to rewrite it?) vote you?
But Onidsen voted you before you voted. Did you mean that Ghost and Visovics are scum?
Nononono. The point was to make an obviously stupid move. Voting back Oni just because he voted was is totally unreasonable. My train of thought was that the scum will want to lynch somebody on day 1 to increase their chances but they have to control the crowd to avoid being lynched themselves. Therefor they will most likely jump on somebody who acts stupidly and may be an easy deal to convince the others that I'm being and definitely a harmful character. And guess what, Biggs who was already suspicious for me (as I stated earlier) eagerly jumped on my bait enforcing my suspicion.
-3 hours until night falls. (Night falls at 15:50 EST)
Votes
@BiggsIRL -ovinomanc3r, Norell, Visovics
@Onidsen -
@Truthiness - JJs Juggernaut
@Norell - Onidsen, Slippy Nippy, BiggsIRL
@Norell Wait. Let me get this straight:
I'm mildly suspicious of you.
You act scummy.
I'm more suspicious of you.
Therefore I'm scummy?
3 hours left in the day is a good time to get you to -1, and I've already posted a good Scum chart in case I get killed tonight.
##vote Norell
19 minutes ago, Norell said:Also we should try to write more in character. I can't be the only one who got a hilarious character description in the PM
![]()
I really like my name
Ovi Wanna Bowie
Btw. I am probably the only one who doesn't care too much about your, well, eyes.
21 minutes ago, Norell said:Nononono. The point was to make an obviously stupid move. Voting back Oni just because he voted was is totally unreasonable. My train of thought was that the scum will want to lynch somebody on day 1 to increase their chances but they have to control the crowd to avoid being lynched themselves. Therefor they will most likely jump on somebody who acts stupidly and may be an easy deal to convince the others that I'm being and definitely a harmful character. And guess what, Biggs who was already suspicious for me (as I stated earlier) eagerly jumped on my bait enforcing my suspicion.
Norell, you are on the brink of being lynched. This is not a very good explanation.
Fluke Mudskipper, at your service...I just wanna find the traitors so we can get out of this dump.
7 minutes ago, CaribbeanNinja said:Norell, you are on the brink of being lynched. This is not a very good explanation.
Well what do you expect? Should I start beg? Or you're expecting that I'm gonna say "yes, I'm scum, please lynch me"? Or that I say what role (if any) I have? That would again something that a scum would do to force power roles out of hiding...
5 minutes ago, Norell said:Well what do you expect? Should I start beg? Or you're expecting that I'm gonna say "yes, I'm scum, please lynch me"? Or that I say what role (if any) I have? That would again something that a scum would do to force power roles out of hiding...
At this point I think revealing your role is your only hope for survival. As stubborn as I am about day one kills, even I'm starting to get skeptical of your innocence. You're not mounting a good defense.
It is amazing how easy it is to get on a train of thought and totally ignore any other reason...
By the was I'm a town(ship) aligned watcher. Which also means if you don't lynch me I'll be likely targeted at the night. Well done...
##unvote Norell