1 minute ago, Norell said:

It is amazing how easy it is to get on a train of thought and totally ignore any other reason...

By the was I'm a town(ship) aligned watcher. Which also means if you don't lynch me I'll be likely targeted at the night. Well done...

An easy girl... watching? Whoever our leader was he deserve to die. Who assigned a task like that to a *****??

Obviously I'm late to arrive home every night

Had to quickly get him out of the H-1 if he is speaking the truth, now comes how we know if it IS the truth or not

5 minutes ago, Norell said:

It is amazing how easy it is to get on a train of thought and totally ignore any other reason...

By the was I'm a town(ship) aligned watcher. Which also means if you don't lynch me I'll be likely targeted at the night. Well done...

What does it say on the role PM, before it says your name?

"You are loyal crewman Laya Whoregana!"

well, I deeply apologise Norell

we still need to go somewhere and have no time, the second on my list comes on

##Vote BiggsIRL

You seem to be pushing very hard and has all that fluff about "this is my list of who I think is what", which reads to me as "I want to look like town"

Btw Visovics +1 to me.

I know even a traitor would have been avoided the lynch stepping back but at least you were the first.

We are punishing every post. Let's reward something at least.

Dang it @JJs Juggernaut where are you?

Two possibilities from the voting so far.

Biggs and Onidsen are scum and voted to get rid of Norell. (Biggs even has Onidsen pegged as definite town in his fluff.)

Ovimanc3r and Norell are scum and voted to get rid of Biggs. (I would say the ties here are definitely weaker. I cannot tie Visovics to this since his vote was on Norell before his claim.)

Hmm...I am reminded of Visovics claim at the beginning of the last game. It got him out of a hanging, and nearly got him to the end of the game. Hopefully Norell gets a little more scrutiny than that.

On the other hand, a Watcher is useful information, worth saving if village.

##unvote Norell

The unfortunate thing is that I'm not suspicious of BiggsIRL at all, and he's the only other viable target for today. I'm not even sure what the big deal about suspicion on Biggs is? Can somebody explain to me - in detail - why Biggs is suspicious and we should get rid of him.

3 minutes ago, Onidsen said:

Hmm...I am reminded of Visovics claim at the beginning of the last game. It got him out of a hanging, and nearly got him to the end of the game. Hopefully Norell gets a little more scrutiny than that.

On the other hand, a Watcher is useful information, worth saving if village.

##unvote Norell

The unfortunate thing is that I'm not suspicious of BiggsIRL at all, and he's the only other viable target for today. I'm not even sure what the big deal about suspicion on Biggs is? Can somebody explain to me - in detail - why Biggs is suspicious and we should get rid of him.

I can talk only by myself.

He voted Truthiness early (I think it was the first vote). His argument was, at the end, "it was just a honey trap for traitors". I didn't like it.

However Truthiness said he voted himself following Biggs play and Norell claimed a similar trick and is watcher (it seems). So I am far for being sure. I didn't change my vote cause my guts said me Norell was a townie fool and at the end all seemed to be between those two.

8 minutes ago, Onidsen said:

The unfortunate thing is that I'm not suspicious of BiggsIRL at all, and he's the only other viable target for today. I'm not even sure what the big deal about suspicion on Biggs is? Can somebody explain to me - in detail - why Biggs is suspicious and we should get rid of him.

I would really like someone to explain that to me as well.

##unvote Norell

Frankly, I'm not sure I believe Norell... but with no counterclaim we're right to pull back.

An hour to go and I'm at -2, and nobody else is close. We SHOULD vote for someone, but it shouldn't be me.

1 minute ago, ovinomanc3r said:

I can talk only by myself.

He voted Truthiness early (I think it was the first vote). His argument was, at the end, "it was just a honey trap for traitors". I didn't like it.

However Truthiness said he voted himself following Biggs play and Norell claimed a similar trick and is watcher (it seems). So I am far for being sure. I didn't change my vote cause my guts said me Norell was a townie fool and at the end all seemed to be between those two.

Two three problems with your logic:

1) I tried the trick first, early, when the day is young and frankly we can joke around a bit.

2) He didn't do it well.

3) He's probably actually scum, with a good fake claim (or lucky, or an actual watcher away from keyboard).

Actually, @ovinomanc3r , what about you? You don't look like you're a fan of scum catching techniques, after all you were okay with an @Norell vote in principle though you weren't dirtying your hands at all. And if I remember right you voted for me even before my trap was officially sprung.

Maybe it's you and @Truthiness who are the scum team?

There certainly is a lot of love between @Onidsen and @BiggsIRL

On the other hand, from a more calmed analysis I see a chance of a townie's war caused by the engagement between two hard defenders of two irreconcilable positions (d1 lynch vs d1 no lynch).

Truthiness was there too but he argued better than Norell.

1 minute ago, BiggsIRL said:

Actually, @ovinomanc3r , what about you? You don't look like you're a fan of scum catching techniques, after all you were okay with an @Norell vote in principle though you weren't dirtying your hands at all. And if I remember right you voted for me even before my trap was officially sprung.

Maybe it's you and @Truthiness who are the scum team?

I didn't jump at Norell cause the h-1 what you did.

However I think I explained myself. I voted you cause your quick vote on Truhiness, your not quite convincing argue and my guts. Ghost and Caribbean had a bad feeling about you too. I was just the first vote.

if we are going to lynch someone today, i can totally vote. what do you guys think?

im sure RL stuff is in the way, but @JJs Juggernaut and @GhostofNobodyInParticular have been totally absent today.

18 minutes ago, CaribbeanNinja said:

There certainly is a lot of love between @Onidsen and @BiggsIRL

Masons with love condition or traitor brotherhood?

45 minutes ago, Onidsen said:

Hmm...I am reminded of Visovics claim at the beginning of the last game. It got him out of a hanging, and nearly got him to the end of the game. Hopefully Norell gets a little more scrutiny than that.

On the other hand, a Watcher is useful information, worth saving if village.

##unvote Norell

The unfortunate thing is that I'm not suspicious of BiggsIRL at all, and he's the only other viable target for today. I'm not even sure what the big deal about suspicion on Biggs is? Can somebody explain to me - in detail - why Biggs is suspicious and we should get rid of him.

So absolutely nothing Biggs has posted has been suspicious to you?

God **** it, this is why I hate day one so much. Power role exposed (unless of course he's lying). ****. Well, hopefully you survive the night and give us some result. Please God let there be a Doc.

7 minutes ago, Visovics said:

Masons with love condition or traitor brotherhood?

It screams something right? there has been a whole lot of covering for each other ON DAY 1 going on here between the two.

They may get through today, but I definitely think we need to watch these two.

If we still have time:

##vote Biggs

Sorry for my absence, real life stepped in, and I wasn't expecting to be gone for so long.

Just now, CaribbeanNinja said:

So absolutely nothing Biggs has posted has been suspicious to you?

Frankly, not at the moment. I see a number of things that could be worth revisiting later, after more results are known, but not really. Similarly with Truthiness - though if I turn out to be wrong on either count, I'd take a long, hard look at the other.

##vote Biggsirl