1 hour ago, That Blasted Samophlange said:

Plus... the lack of the blue dividing line on the base token is not an error. The C-ROC just has a big Aft.

That is just BS.. they simply do not want to acknowledge the mistake and send reprints. The only thing that come to mind is... Shame on u FFG

3 minutes ago, Andreu said:

That is just BS.. they simply do not want to acknowledge the mistake and send reprints. The only thing that come to mind is... Shame on u FFG

Yeah for something like Epic which is not high play tournament useful I am sure the consensus was, "Ehhhh... whatever, close enough."

13 minutes ago, Andreu said:

That is just BS.. they simply do not want to acknowledge the mistake and send reprints. The only thing that come to mind is... Shame on u FFG

Nailed it. Clearly a mistake on their part, proven by the pic from the campaign in today's release announcement which shows the blue line. It would be a costly and lengthy process to print and ship replacements to everyone who buys one, so they errata'd it to make it legal as is. Not really a huge deal, but it's pretty silly that they didn't say "oops, we goofed, we're not going to fix it so here's a quick workaround."

Always the best policy to be open and honest about stuff like this.

1 hour ago, pkreynolds said:

Nailed it. Clearly a mistake on their part, proven by the pic from the campaign in today's release announcement which shows the blue line. It would be a costly and lengthy process to print and ship replacements to everyone who buys one, so they errata'd it to make it legal as is. Not really a huge deal, but it's pretty silly that they didn't say "oops, we goofed, we're not going to fix it so here's a quick workaround."

Always the best policy to be open and honest about stuff like this.

As much as I agree with you as to the actual reason for the errata about the blue line (or lack thereof), it does follow the non-epic rules for the re-enforce action from the Wookie gunship so it's not completely without precident - just seems a little convenient doesn't it

Yes it does. Someone posted a pic of the rules booklet and it has the same rules for the blue center line as all of the other huge ships, so...

2 hours ago, pkreynolds said:

Nailed it. Clearly a mistake on their part, proven by the pic from the campaign in today's release announcement which shows the blue line.

That pic actually shows the Imperial Assault Carrier's base token. Green firing arc, and the ship icon has the triangular profile.

The announcement article from FFG doesn't show a blue line on the C-ROC. It not having one makes the ship interestingly different from the Gozanti. I'm not sure if it's a mistake, but I'm glad of it either way.

6 hours ago, That Blasted Samophlange said:

Plus... the lack of the blue dividing line on the base token is not an error. The C-ROC just has a big Aft.

Unspoiled crew: Freddie Mercury and Sir Mix-a-Lot.

10 hours ago, Marinealver said:

it doesn't clarify everything such as how Azmerogon interacts with Jabba the Hutt.

Don't they happen at completely different times? I don't see how they interact at at all.

Just now, Handler said:

Don't they happen at completely different times? I don't see how they interact at at all.

Depending if Azmergon can replace Jabba or not. So far the consensus is no as Jabba is 2 crew cards. If Azmergon was able to replace Jabba it would not be with 2 <crew> upgrades that is for sure.

2 minutes ago, Marinealver said:

Depending if Azmergon can replace Jabba or not. So far the consensus is no as Jabba is 2 crew cards. If Azmergon was able to replace Jabba it would not be with 2 <crew> upgrades that is for sure.

Right, thanks. Get Jabbas benefit and space him for 2 other crew totalling 5 points? Win-win (except for your opponent)!