On 03/06/2017 at 1:52 AM, Syrmon said:Were are the dark skinned people?
Hello and welcome to the game and its world!
It is a particularly interesting question, especially in the context of fantasy worlds in general.
Edit: I would like to express something more clearly as I failed to do it, in light of some posts.
This thread is NOT a plead for any change in the L5R setting, nor any other setting. It is merely a thought exercise on why are there so few main characters whose skin colour is not light in L5R AND in other fantasy settings, and how that could be changed. The L5R partr is only a starting point, stemming from a question asked in another thread.
I also wnat to express that not every setting, fantasy or otherwise, would benefit from such a change, and that is only my opinion.
Regarding the presence of dark-skinned people in L5R specifically.
In Rokugan, the land where the story of L5R is set, dark skinned people are elsewhere and from elsewhere. It is a land is heavily influenced by feudal Japan and shares a trait with it: xenophobia and self-centerness (centrism ?). What and who is from Rokugan is good, what and who is not is not good. It sounds simplicist, however it is not. Japan is an island (well, islands) and that partly explains its fear and disdain of the outside. Rokugan is not an island, it just acts as an island, with its borders being extremely difficult to cross and by being alienated from the outside world. It is also a land shaped by tradition, "do as your forefathers did, it worked for them, it will work for you". At times, it has tried to be inclusive of foreigners and it turned out badly for the Rokugani people; a fantsay depiction of what happened in real world Japan's history¹. In Japanese, there is the word " gaijin " which means foreigner, and not just from somewhere else, someone who is foreign to Japanese culture. This word exists in L5R¹. Being from somewhere else is equivalent to being from a sub-culture, to Rokugani people, and it takes a lot of effort to change this viewpoint; the number of foreigners who have been accepted is far too anecdotal to be relevant here.
Although, it is a fantasy setting and what is done with it is not restricted by reality. I disagree. It is indeed a fantasy setting, and it does not try to depict reality, because that would be boring and pointless, however any setting is a reference to something already existing; any creation is just a representation of our own perception of reality. Why does it matter here? Suspension of disbelief. We can easily imagine fireballs being rained down from the heavens thanks to the prayers of a priest to some unseen entity because it is so far off that it has no echo in reality to counter the idea, and because it echoes with what we know of Asian mythology. However, it is common knowledge that Japanese and, more generally, Asian people are light-skinned and it would ring a weird bell having a fair² amount of dark-skinned people as heroes of Rokugan, merely because it would be counter to what we have come to accept as fact.
Regarding the comparison to the number of women depicted as hero samurais and how it could be applied to dark-skinned people.
This forum clearly shows that the depiction of women, number-wise and story-wise, is not an universal truth, everyone has a different opinion. For one thing, it also shows howw society evolved and how we want to continue evolving it. It is an historical fact that Japan was and still is a male-centric society. Why then are we trying to remove this data when depicting a fantasy setting primarily based on this country? Because we want to put an end to old stereotypes, to change how society views and depicts some people in a way we find offensive and sometimes abusive. Why then can't we do the same for dark-skinned people? Because it would be too big a change from our reality. We can much more easily accept women as hero samurais because there is a wave of change crashing all over the world to put an end to sexism, and there are more and more depictions of women in situations that are not historically accurate in all kinds of media. Why then can't we do the same for dark-skinned people??? It can be done, just not yet. Having dark-skinned samurais is still a one-off;
Afro Samurai
is a good example of that: his name is proof that the colour of his skin is an oddity when linked to feudal Japan concepts.
There are some artistic creations that include dark-skinned people as heroes in a feudal Japan influenced setting, such as
The Man with the Iron Fists
, who try to incorporate them as normallly as possible, however they often fall back on the idea that dark-skinned people are foreigners. This is done in order to ensure the audience is captivated, to keep it entertainedand not lose ot in sterile debates where one would argue that it is not historically accurate. It is purely an economic decision. It is the point where artistic freedom meets economic reality, where theory collides with concrete.
Regarding the presence of dark-skinned people in fantasy worlds
Most of the time, dark-skinned characters are shown in modern world settings. However, in recent artistic creations, there is a clear will to depict fantasy heroic characters as dark-skinned people, even when it was not originally the case; the example are numerous and can easily be found. Sometimes, that is even done contrary to the preservation of the suspension of disbelief, as Idris Elba playing the role of Heimdall in Thor . Heimdall is part of the Norse mythology and when thinking Norse, the ideas that spring to mind are blond, vikings, beards and definitely not dark-skinned Idris Elba. Why then was he cast for the role? Because there is a will to change set ideas, for dark-skinned notably. What about the economic reality? Well, really, Marvel, and all the companies behind it, can afford to do this, because they have a strong economy already and having a specific point that will cause debate will not cause its downfall nor put it in peril.
The amount of dark-skinned people depicted as heroic characters in fantasy worlds is not always linked to the setting. Lord of the Rings by J.R.R. Tolkien does not depict dark-skinned heroic characters, nor does the Peter Jackson's version. But why? Indeed, why?! It would not be a stretch to have dark-skinned hobbits, or a dark-skinned Gandalf, even though he is called the White. Lord of the Rings 's setting is heavily fictional and having less ties to reality would be a perfect starting point to help change old ideas and broaden minds.
Regarding the introduction of dark-skinned people in fantasy worlds
The depiction of characters must not feel forced, be they women, dark-skinned people or light-skinned males. It must feel incorporated in the setting, a natural flow of the story. Changing mentalities with force will only create counter effects, where prople reject the new ideas. Idris Elba as Heimdall was surprising but did not feel forced because the setting took liberties with Norse mythology on several other points. More importantly, it was done in a mainstream media and had a worldwide impact. Mainstream media has a role to play here, by changing what can be changed without too much adverse reaction, in order to show it can be done and that the gender and colour of the skin of a character have no impact, if there is no valid reason story-wise.
In L5R, the introduction of other nations and their people, as it was done with Legend of the Burning Sands , would be a nice way to introduce heroic characters who are dark-skinned and tell new stories. It may even end up as way to end Rokugan's xenophobia and have dark-skinned samurais, by way of travels and marriages. It is a story I would love to read, hear and be a part of. However, this story will take time to be told because Rokugan is a xenophobic mythical feudal Japan and Asia influenced land.
¹ it was true in the old L5R lore, it remains to be seen if it is still accurate.
² fair here means a significant number of heroic, Rokugan-born-and-raised samurai, not just a random adopted samurai.
Edited by Mirumoto Kuroniten