Rate this list

By GringoFett, in Imperial Assault Skirmish

Got a little in-store tournament coming up this is what I am thinking on running.

Grand Inquisitor

BT

Agent Blaise

ISB Infil

2x Stormtroopers

Command cards I have not settled on yet but heavy on the Force user and Spys is what I am thinking.

Thoughts?

Edited by GringoFett

Stormtroopers are very easy to kill . Too many different types you have Hunter, spy, trooper and droid.

Where's zillo?

Maybe drop one of the stormies making the other elite. Add zillo and a officer. Targeting computer on BT is always nice

Target priority would be to burn down BT and then chip away at inquisitor. If jabba is sitting on the other side, those Rstormtroopers are 6 extra points. I would try to focus the list more into one archetype, blaise and the spies do well to negate the hunter cards.

If you're set on your figure choice, I'd remove a rStormtrooper and upgrade to eISB and eStormtrooper and either targeting computer on BT or zillo.

Probably zillo though to keep your guys on the board a little longer and it'll really help out GI with his white defense.

Alternatively, you could remove one rStormtrooper and replace with rISB to up your spies since you wanted heavy spy and force user CCs and that still leaves you room for targeting computer or zillo.

I'd probably go with the first suggestion though.

i'd probably fit all the spy cards I wanted in and then go with Hunter cards over the force user cards. You'll want to fit a few more spies as well. Double eISB is probably better than the stormtroopers

9Inq

6BT + tC

7 eISB x2

6blaise

1zillo

2officer

rule by fear maybe?

I actually did have eISB in the list I just missed putting that in originally.

Thanks for the suggestions guys I will play around with it an let you know how it runs.

I fear its a little too diverse and not focused enough on doing something well over doing a lot of things okay.

I know folks really like Zillo and I have ran it with trooper lists but I have honestly not seen it do that well for me. Granted its a small sample size so maybe I just have not ran it enough.