Just now, Madaghmire said:

Its ok to be rebel aligned! We're hunting hutts!

Yeah, I vouch for supporting the rebel alliance, we are not the villains in this forgotten village!

I don't get it why am I still the main suspect.... How should I have known what Ovi is going to say? And why would have I admitted so fast that I wasn't the voice he heard if it would have been only a plan to frame JJ?If it would be a rouse then my actions wouldn't make sense.

15 minutes ago, GhostofNobodyInParticular said:

::Sigh::

First you say you're suspicious of one, and we vote, then you learn that if you're wrong we vote you and completely turn around your opinion. . . . Then PT votes you (justifiably I might add). . how 'bout we kill off JJ for being swing-y, Ovi for being indecisive, Norell 'cause he's Public Enemy #1 on most lists, and see how that goes? One at a time of course, subject to change. . . .

I am just waiting a clarification about my voice.

If he doesn't appear then I will probably will be lynched but at least you will learn something: Whoever heard the voice this night will know it is a liar and is looking just for dissension.

All you must remember that all I did becomes my position weaker, not stronger and it was obvious that saying something hard to believe and impossible to proof wasn't going to help me. But I did. I could let Norell die but I didn't cause I think there was something wrong. Why I didn't shut up my mouth? In order to save Norell? And my great plan was "ey guys I hear voices in my head".

I had that voice. And I would quote here if it wasn't a quote cause I have no idea about how quoting quotes.

The thing is that whoever talked in my head was not voting JJ (if Norell is saying the truth and he is not the voice) so my head voice doesn't seem trustworthy. That is the reason I unvoted JJs.

What I could do is to quote my short conversation with Biggs asking about the voice but I don't know if it would be against the rules.

2 minutes ago, ovinomanc3r said:

What I could do is to quote my short conversation with Biggs asking about the voice but I don't know if it would be against the rules.

So @BiggsIRL , does he have the green light? We haven't much timr left

6 minutes ago, ovinomanc3r said:

What I could do is to quote my short conversation with Biggs asking about the voice but I don't know if it would be against the rules.

Lets keep in mind that if it isn't against the rules, then inventing a believable conversation and quoting it also isn't. <Side Note: I would be against allowing direct forum quotes, as not everyone has computer skills to forge those>

Hey all! #meta my care broke down on a drive last night (belt this time), been busy since then.

Wow! What an interesting turn of developments.

So, whoever whispered to Ovin, is trying to cast suspicion on to me, that's either Ovin lying, or some Hutt misdirecting. I am a TOWN aligned Ordinary Moisture Farmer, which any true townie should understand by now.

I also had an interesting experience night one, which I've hinted about, and why I trust Ovin more, since he seems to have had a similar experience (or he is the instigator of mine and is playing it off well). Basically, I didn't feel like doing anything anyway night one (since I don't have a night action), but for some reason I felt the urg to do nothing even more! (Hutt blocker role??). I went and got drunk instead.

So if I die, either by hammer or night kill, I still really suspect Norell and Tirion. I'd prefer to hit Norell first, since he has been the most suspicious, and if he was a townie I think he should have picked up on some things....

9 minutes ago, JJs Juggernaut said:

So if I die, either by hammer or night kill, I still really suspect Norell and Tirion. I'd prefer to hit Norell first, since he has been the most suspicious, and if he was a townie I think he should have picked up on some things....

You do realize that you just increased your chances to be killed at night, right? (As killing someone and then pursuing his accusations next day is a classic false flag operation)

I suppose, but I like to throw out all the possibilities. Though if I'm correct about Tirion, the Hutts wouldn't want to pursue that.

Ok. I really think JJ is town, and the hutts have some kind of night whisperer that at the very least, is fluent in bacchi.

Someone here is definetely f*cking lying. I really wish I knew who it was.

Jj why do you suspect Tirion?

1 minute ago, JJs Juggernaut said:

I suppose, but I like to throw out all the possibilities. Though if I'm correct about Tirion, the Hutts wouldn't want to pursue that.

Correct what? I've followed your lead..... I'm still confused how that makes me a suspect.

Just now, Madaghmire said:

Ok. I really think JJ is town, and the hutts have some kind of night whisperer that at the very least, is fluent in bacchi.

Someone here is definetely f*cking lying. I really wish I knew who it was.

Jj why do you suspect Tirion?

Please do tell

Ugg, I dislike needing to retype it all up, let me find the my previous posts.

22 hours ago, JJs Juggernaut said:

Mainly just when it comes to you. Your inconsistencies are really starting to worry me. Your "clear logical reasons" were "I'm not sold on norell the same way some others are. But as I have previously stated we aren't going to win by not hanging. I was willing enough when the clock was running down yesterday to vote so I guess I'll vote again if this is the direction we are going. I am aware this puts us at 5. But I don't really see the consensus shifting that hard away from norell since he almost died yesterday. "

The only reason you give is that you will go along with the group...while also sneakily putting Norell on h-1...something you should never do until he has had a chance to claim and we agree then to hammer or not. Your deflections are just making you more suspicious, so much so I'm highly considering voting for you instead of norell.

From day 1:

Tirion : Fairly active. Joined the conversation a page or so in (not unusual, but delays can mean they are off coordinating with Mafia members; or maybe it means they just had IRL stuff to do!). Expressed concern after last game about the day 1 hammer, but expressed some agreement with my early assessments against Visovics; eventually decided to join #TeamHammerDay1 (though he never actually voted, stating not wanting to put Visovics at h-1). Expressed some concern at Truthiness's actions towards me. Questioned Madaghmire; some thought it appeared overly friendly (maybe due to both being in the last game?), admitted that it was a device to get Madaghmire into the conversation and try to fish for information. Came to Caribbean Ninja's defense for not being active (saying "I said it last game I'll say it again this game just because you haven't posted in a little bit doesn't mean anything "), but then questioned me for being quiet over the night (saying "Might not mean anything but JJ sure has gotten pretty quite. ", and to my response "Not completely dismissing it but fair enough. You do have a fancy trophy and all!"). I find it a rather interesting switch from, "it doesn't mean anything" to "Not completely dismissing it".

Also, I feel like by now, most regular townies should trust me, so interpret that as you will.

Just now, JJs Juggernaut said:

You keep claiming my inconsistencies, but when I ask what inconsistencies you don't provide anything. Yes I laid out clear logical why I wanted to vote on someone then I clearly explained why I was trying to get mad to talk, then I explained why I appeared inconsistent on the absence part of it with you and I don't remember who.

But you just keep coming inconsistent

3 minutes ago, JJs Juggernaut said:

Also, I feel like by now, most regular townies should trust me, so interpret that as you will.

I'm not voting against you...... In fact my last vote followed you on norell then you chastised me for it.

Also all I said was you were all over the place. So again I'm asking how does that point at me or make me untrustworthy of you?

The only things that made me suspect you was your erraticness and your victim painting in your summary.

Just because you came up with a reason to explain inconsistencies, doesn't mean they still weren't inconsistent....I have provided numerous examples, and you keep claiming I haven't, so at this point, I'm not discussing it with you anymore.

7 minutes ago, JJs Juggernaut said:

Just because you came up with a reason to explain inconsistencies, doesn't mean they still weren't inconsistent....I have provided numerous examples, and you keep claiming I haven't, so at this point, I'm not discussing it with you anymore.

Ok?

I didn't come with reasons I showed why they were consistent

Guys, we are a few hours away!!! we need a decision, otherwise it's a free kill!!!

Right now everything is risky, we don't know if Norell is truly a vanilla as he claims, we don't know if JJ is a vanilla as he claims, we don't know if Ovi is lying or if the message happened and we don't know if Tirion is as suspect as JJ says he is!!

We need a decision quickly, otherwise this will be a disaster. We are crumbling apart and pointing fingers in every direction! Stop acting emotionally and act rationally!! We need to get to an agreement on lynching and right now we are nowhere near one!

I think it should be Norell, but I've already voted for him.

Im going to follow JJ's lead on this. I am not wholly convinced on Norell, but somebody has to die, and I don't see a better option.

##vote Norell

My vote is already on Norell, no intention of changing, that totals 3, same number JJ has on his head.