Just now, Visovics said:

**** that is some bad internet

Nevermind that, posts were showing double to me

1 minute ago, PT106 said:

Can you explain to me, what was wrong in Norell behavior? I didn't get the reason for hammering him day 1, and I certainly don't get it now.

Norell was quiet day 1. I was the first person to finger him, and though the memory is indoubtably special to both of us, learning that he lives in Europe and thats why he was so quiet more or less eases the concern that he was quiet because he was fine with the way things were progressing as a hutt.

3 minutes ago, PT106 said:

Can you explain to me, what was wrong in Norell behavior? I didn't get the reason for hammering him day 1, and I certainly don't get it now.

Supported the no-vote (not the biggest of worries) but he also appeared to be fishing for the cop role and gave very superficial explanation for it

Meh - I voted Norell explicitly because it was our starting point for last night. It started a discussion, which was good. We've backed off of a lynch - because of a lack of a defense? Which seems...odd to me, but a meta-analysis saying that if he were evil somebody would be defending him is well-taken. In that case, I'm seeing a link between @Norell and @ovinomanc3r .

If Norell is evil, ovin probably is.

I'm not actually making an accusation at the moment, just pointing out connections that seem interesting to me.

Unlike the last game, it appears that there aren't unique call-signs to use to identify ourselves, so the "claim at lynch - 2" gives us less information than otherwise. Without knowing how many regular moisture farmers there could possibly be, the claims are much less useful.

In addition, claiming in-thread cuts down the possible places for power roles to be hiding. I'll confess to being exceptionally reticent about the whole public claiming idea in particular. I died before I could register my discontent last game, though, so this game will have to do.

2 minutes ago, PT106 said:

Can you explain to me, what was wrong in Norell behavior? I didn't get the reason for hammering him day 1, and I certainly don't get it now.

He has been very inactive, despite being called out. He made a statement hat very much looked like he was trying to find out who our cop was (if so it could mean he is either a protector/medic, or he is a Hutt trying to find a night kill target). He was against a day 1 hammer (look were that got us), and still appears to hold to that opinion (?!?!?!). His initial defense to my accusation was "he just wants to kill someone desperately".

He also questioned my claim of being Just an Ordinary Moisture Farmer. I guess my being TOWN aligned isn't enough for him.

We still have quite a bit of time, but I feel pretty confident with him as our hammer.

2 minutes ago, PT106 said:

Can you explain to me, what was wrong in Norell behavior? I didn't get the reason for hammering him day 1, and I certainly don't get it now.

He has been very inactive, despite being called out. He made a statement hat very much looked like he was trying to find out who our cop was (if so it could mean he is either a protector/medic, or he is a Hutt trying to find a night kill target). He was against a day 1 hammer (look were that got us), and still appears to hold to that opinion (?!?!?!). His initial defense to my accusation was "he just wants to kill someone desperately".

He also questioned my claim of being Just an Ordinary Moisture Farmer. I guess my being TOWN aligned isn't enough for him.

We still have quite a bit of time, but I feel pretty confident with him as our hammer.

https://youtu.be/tVdVrvDzuXY

This came up on my playlist, couldn't resist

Damnit double post!

Just now, JJs Juggernaut said:

Damnit double post!

I know the feeling, tho mine end up vanishing

5 minutes ago, Onidsen said:

Meh - I voted Norell explicitly because it was our starting point for last night.

Aren't you mixing up Norell and Visovics?

1 minute ago, PT106 said:

Aren't you mixing up Norell and Visovics?

They turned into Norell on the last 4 hours of game because of his fishy business but didn't het enough

Just now, PT106 said:

Aren't you mixing up Norell and Visovics?

No, after Visovics's claim we tried to start putting pressure on Norell as a secondary, since more information sooner is better. So by starting point, I think he meant where we left off.

1 minute ago, Visovics said:

They turned into Norell on the last 4 hours of game because of his fishy business but didn't het enough

Yes, but it definitely wasn't a starting point of last night, that's what I'm saying.

Just now, PT106 said:

Yes, but it definitely wasn't a starting point of last night, that's what I'm saying.

He meant where they left off when night fell, pressuring Norell for an explanation, he posted an almost meaningless during night and got some heavy breathing from Biggs, and then tried to turn to JJ

10 minutes ago, JJs Juggernaut said:

No, after Visovics's claim we tried to start putting pressure on Norell as a secondary, since more information sooner is better. So by starting point, I think he meant where we left off.

That's also how I read this.

There is not much I could add really. I am a mere moisture farmer as I have always been - but as I already pointed out this is not much because obviously any Hutt goon with a half mind would say the same. Too bad we lost our cop the first night because I'm pretty sure he would have checked on me - at least I would have in his place.

I did not say much on Day 1 because real life problems got between me and the game, that's all I can say. That, and the fact that I don't really like to mindlessly accuse random people without a reason. I'm surprised how much SOME people started to fixate on that... I think others said for me what could be said, I wouldn't repeat them now.

And sadly this will be my last post for the night because it's late here.

4 minutes ago, Norell said:

There is not much I could add really. I am a mere moisture farmer as I have always been - but as I already pointed out this is not much because obviously any Hutt goon ( 75% WARNING possible Hutt term ) with a half mind would say the same. (Too bad we lost our cop the first night because I'm pretty sure he would have checked on me - at least I would have in his place. (33% (True we lost Truthiness, but this smells a little of deflection.))

I did not say much on Day 1 because real life problems got between me and the game, that's all I can say. ( 5% (Probably true) ) That, and the fact that I don't really like to mindlessly accuse random people without a reason. (40% (WARNING - it seems like the experienced players counter this) ) I'm surprised how much SOME people started to fixate on that... I think others said for me (75% WARNING - definitely deflected by others.) what could be said, I wouldn't repeat them now.

And sadly this will be my last post for the night because it's late here. (5% (Probably true - good night)

Oh man...now to figure out if this is true or not...

My Hutt detection percentages are in STRONG RED.

2 minutes ago, CaribbeanNinja said:

Oh man...now to figure out if this is true or not...

My Hutt detection percentages are in STRONG RED.

You need to start doing that for everyone!

2 hours ago, Onidsen said:

If Norell is evil, ovin probably is.

I know I couldn't avoid that. But it is fine. I actually think you, JJs and Caribbean being the hutts but it is just an intuition.

The thing is I am around 75% sure about Norell being townie.

I cannot claim anything but being a "drunk" moisture farmer who seems was involved in some kind of drug adventure last night.

All I can say is that: if JJs is really a moisture farmer, Norell is hutt with a 99% (I always leave the 1% of epic stupidity).

Now I need to sleep.

I trust Ovin.

18 minutes ago, ovinomanc3r said:

I actually think you [Odinsen], JJs and Caribbean being the hutts

13 minutes ago, JJs Juggernaut said:

I trust Ovin.

Now I'm confused. Is this some kind of a.. Rebel conspiracy?

19 minutes ago, ovinomanc3r said:

I know I couldn't avoid that. But it is fine. I actually think you, JJs and Caribbean being the hutts but it is just an intuition.

The thing is I am around 75% sure about Norell being townie.

I cannot claim anything but being a "drunk" moisture farmer who seems was involved in some kind of drug adventure last night.

All I can say is that: if JJs is really a moisture farmer, Norell is hutt with a 99% (I always leave the 1% of epic stupidity).

Now I need to sleep.

So which direction should we go? If you're 75% sure norell is innocent what is your percentage on JJ? Or anyone else for that matter?

Those of us that are overly quite now would be a good time to jump in and give opinions.

Cause I swear if we go 2 nights not voting........

9 minutes ago, PT106 said:

Now I'm confused. Is this some kind of a.. Rebel conspiracy?

To be honest I think it's just trying to get favor with the leader of one's kill squad.

45 minutes ago, Tirion said:

So which direction should we go? If you're 75% sure norell is innocent what is your percentage on JJ? Or anyone else for that matter?

Those of us that are overly quite now would be a good time to jump in and give opinions.

Cause I swear if we go 2 nights not voting........

I'm in general agreement with @ovinomanc3r (except for targeting me ) I believe that either @Norell or @JJs Juggernaut should the the focus right now. One of them is probably a hutt.

Norell, for the points I brought up before about his last post.

JJ, because he has tried to sway our perceptions a lot. If he is a hutt, dang he is playing us all like a fiddle.

I'm leaning towards Norell 65/35 right now.

As i stated previously, jj reads as town or godfather to me.