I voted Norell as well.

I really want to hear from Norell. If I dont hear something I like I am almost certainly voting for him.

2 hours ago, JJs Juggernaut said:

I voted Norell as well.

Okay, so I don't have an automatic text parser, so if you'd put your votes on a separate line from your text that would be a great help to your humble GM, even if it lacks the rhetorical flourish of putting it in with the rest of the text.

1 hour ago, BiggsIRL said:

Okay, so I don't have an automatic text parser, so if you'd put your votes on a separate line from your text that would be a great help to your humble GM, even if it lacks the rhetorical flourish of putting it in with the rest of the text.

I figured the reason you had us go ##vote was so you could easily Control+F and parse through the page, haha.

While there's not yet much evidence to base any accusations on (but when is there ever?) I'm going to

##vote Norell

until such time as he proves himself innocent. At least this way the pressure is on him just a bit more. I warn you though not to completely trust @Visovics . Until his effect is used, there is no evidence of it existing, much like Dab's role last game. If he's rebel, then it's the easiest thing in the world to say he protected somebody who didn't die and is definitely innocent.

So I also think that those of us who are town need to be aware of a Hutt blocker role. I'm just going to throw that out there.

Norell is silent because he lives in Europe so has different time windows to write then most of you. Plus I was really busy in the last couple of days, I apologize, I don't want to jeopardize the game.

But you really should read back what happened in the first day and who is stirring the mess. JJ is the one who is trying to murder someone at any cost. First Truthiness then me, without having any information. Isn't this at least a little suspicious?

Last day I did not vote because I don't believe in whichunts but seeing that his first thing in the morning was to start accusations anew...

## vote JJ Juggernaut

He just wants to kill people too desperately.

By the way, how could one proves his innocence here? Saying that "I'm just a moisture farmer"? Wouldn't one say that even if he wasn't?

1 hour ago, GhostofNobodyInParticular said:

until such time as he proves himself innocent. At least this way the pressure is on him just a bit more. I warn you though not to completely trust @Visovics . Until his effect is used, there is no evidence of it existing, much like Dab's role last game. If he's rebel, then it's the easiest thing in the world to say he protected somebody who didn't die and is definitely innocent.

I need to die to prove my innocence, and right now I'm trying, but I'm not an absolute genius who can predict a hutt kill.

7 hours ago, Norell said:

Norell is silent because he lives in Europe so has different time windows to write then most of you. Plus I was really busy in the last couple of days, I apologize, I don't want to jeopardize the game.

But you really should read back what happened in the first day and who is stirring the mess. JJ is the one who is trying to murder someone at any cost. First Truthiness then me, without having any information. Isn't this at least a little suspicious?

Last day I did not vote because I don't believe in whichunts but seeing that his first thing in the morning was to start accusations anew...

## vote JJ Juggernaut

He just wants to kill people too desperately.

Europe is a good reason for the silence.

Jj backed off of Truth pretty quickly though. Could mean he figured Truth had a power role and didnt want him to die, as he says.

Could be he figured Truth had a power role and so he... killed him! <dun dun duuuuuun>

JJ's posts read to me as either vanilla town or Godfather.

Norell is trying desperately to throw suspicion off of himself, as he should. I'd say "I don't believe in witch hunts" is sort of a strange remark for someone playing this game, because this is basically a simulated witch hunt. Not really evidence of anything, just sayin'.

I'm a little concerned he's unsure of how to make a full claim.

I'm equally concerned there are already three votes on him, and none of them are mine. For that to be a good thing, it means a full 50% of the remaining town has to be voting for Norell.

I'm also suspicious of slippy NiPpy, because ghosts creep me out.

5 minutes ago, Madaghmire said:

JJ's posts read to me as either vanilla town or Godfather.

I don't know though, he has really pushed the conversation in specific directions. Not that that is a bad thing, but my suspicion is growing.

I'm still very suspicious of @PT106 , @Onidsen and @JJs Juggernaut (a little).

Of course I'm trying to get rid of the suspicion. I don't want to die!

@Norell you are pretty suspicious:

Did you pour out blue milk to me in the cantina? My headache is killing me since last night.

Nah, that was Maggot the bartender. I was the one who ordered the round of Galactic Buttkicker last night, remember?

By the way, did you know that the Butkicker is 50% made of Jury Juice? You can buy it for half a cred on every market...

9 hours ago, Norell said:

Norell is silent because he lives in Europe so has different time windows to write then most of you. Plus I was really busy in the last couple of days, I apologize, I don't want to jeopardize the game.

But you really should read back what happened in the first day and who is stirring the mess. JJ is the one who is trying to murder someone at any cost. First Truthiness then me, without having any information. Isn't this at least a little suspicious?

Last day I did not vote because I don't believe in whichunts but seeing that his first thing in the morning was to start accusations anew...

## vote JJ Juggernaut

He just wants to kill people too desperately.

You are sounding very much like putting yourself in the light side, you also seem to be trying to take a lot of attention of yourself and into JJ, and even over exaggerating, because it wasn't him who started it off on you in the morning, and JJ was not the only one to want a day one lynch, as his argument was also very well backed up. Much better than yours right now.

That "not wanting" witch hunt seems very unusual, since it is the only way to take the mafia down, so I think you are trying to prolong the amount of chances the mafia gets free kills

##Vote Norrel

As wishy-washy as this sounds.

I'm not sold on norell the same way some others are. But as I have previously stated we aren't going to win by not hanging. I was willing enough when the clock was running down yesterday to vote so I guess I'll vote again if this is the direction we are going. I am aware this puts us at 5. But I don't really see the consensus shifting that hard away from norell since he almost died yesterday.

##vote @Norell

37 minutes ago, Norell said:

By the way, did you know that the Butkicker is 50% made of Jury Juice? You can buy it for half a cred on every market...

It reminds me the tea discussion is somewhere in the main forum

I really think is you or JJs (unless Visovics is a liar) so I will...

##vote JJs

Visovics put you on hammer-2 so I am not going to be so stupid to rise it. But even without that, it is clear for me thay you are not going to claim until it was probably late. I am curious about if JJs would protect his role as far as you. I cannot avoid the fact that both could be hutt and JJs is just buying our confidence selling a fellow.

9 minutes ago, ovinomanc3r said:

I cannot avoid the fact that both could be hutt and JJs is just buying our confidence selling a fellow.

You are raising quite a good point there, if both can attract the attention to the other, there may be a point where both back off at the last minute and there is no vote

##unvote @Norell

Need to consider ovi's point

1 hour ago, ovinomanc3r said:

Did you pour out blue milk to me in the cantina? My headache is killing me since last night.

So was this just random banter, or did you actually have a "headache"? I know I got sloppy drunk at the cantina last night....

5 minutes ago, Tirion said:

##unvote @Norell

Need to consider ovi's point

Putting him on 5 is dangerous, and can be taken as suspicious, especially if he hasn't had a chance to claim!

29 minutes ago, Visovics said:

You are raising quite a good point there, if both can attract the attention to the other, there may be a point where both back off at the last minute and there is no vote

While these are valid points, it is not what is happening here. Proving that though, well there is not much I can do for you there.