55 minutes ago, durandal343 said:Yeah, I was fairly strong on that view. Then I was beaten into submission by the masses
![]()
This seems like something that will be argued across the Armada table by people who haven't visited the Ministry of Love (joke! no offense! I really appreciate the help!) so I still feel that it could be more clear, but acknowledge that making every card extra clear for everyone in the world is an impossible job...
To be fair, I do think there is a strong argument for your conclusion.
You are spending the dial as if you had a token, but you can't actually spend what you don't have . I will concede that you cannot do: (dial + token) + token but you can just as easily argue that the text is written to give you the effect of spending a matching token, without actually spending it because you know, if you had spent the token, that's the effect you would have gotten (depending on token).