34 minutes ago, Doji Makoto said:

Still waiting for a card that would generate honor...

The philosophy card seems to do that for the clan, so that's 1 card. For now.

3 minutes ago, clanmccracken said:

Compared to what it used to do, I would. But I'm not really complaining . Just something I observed.

You also just get it now, without really needing to put any work or effort into it. It is an extra reward for playing the conflict phase a certain way. It serves a very different purpose than it did in the CCG.

8 minutes ago, Ultimatecalibur said:

The is an awful complaint, not straight from MtG (this pacifism allows characters to assign to political conflicts).

It is also not a weak card to feature as it shows another aspect of Phoenix control.

Go stand on one leg... ?

Do you think the Togashi Initiate's ability requires a fate from him, any of your characters or the fate pool? Wording seems to indicate the later.

7 minutes ago, Kubernes said:

The philosophy card seems to do that for the clan, so that's 1 card. For now.

Yeah, you are right, I totally forgot about it.

1 minute ago, Doji Tori said:

Do you think the Togashi Initiate's ability requires a fate from him, any of your characters or the fate pool? Wording seems to indicate the later.

Your fate pool.

So reprieve card could let an important card stick around another turn during the fate phase is a neat effect.

also, admit defeat with that crane personality that forces a lone defender seems like fun.

hopefully this game does not become to overwhelming with all the decisions you could make in a turn.

card art is still a 8/10 for me so far.

6 hours ago, Doji Tori said:

Do you think the Togashi Initiate's ability requires a fate from him, any of your characters or the fate pool? Wording seems to indicate the later.

Basically you can pay one of your fate, putting it on a ring, to make it a 3/3.

17 minutes ago, clanmccracken said:

I thought they built up fate, not honor

Opps you're correct. I meant to say fate but said honor. I really need to stop posting on forums when I am half awake.

4 minutes ago, TechnoGolem said:

I really need to stop posting on forums when I am half awake.

Just dont spill the tea. That costs you 5 honor, and removes honor requirements from all of your personalities

.

The articles all mention a general pool of tokens, etc. While this might be the case for casual games, I've never seen this actually happen in competitive games. Do you think it will happen in this? Or will people still just keep track of their own stuff?

1 minute ago, slowreflex said:

The articles all mention a general pool of tokens, etc. While this might be the case for casual games, I've never seen this actually happen in competitive games. Do you think it will happen in this? Or will people still just keep track of their own stuff?

It is just generally meant to mean the tokens not currently under any player's personal control, in the game. I wouldn't read much into it beyond that.

3 minutes ago, slowreflex said:

The articles all mention a general pool of tokens, etc. While this might be the case for casual games, I've never seen this actually happen in competitive games. Do you think it will happen in this? Or will people still just keep track of their own stuff?

The question is whether or not the general "honor pool" and "fate pool" are limited in size.

There may be some implication that you can play attachments during the Dynasty phase (Use actions on cards), which is before the conflict phase. I'm guessing that unless it says otherwise, you can use actions either during the dynasty or conflict phases.

I also think the implication from this is that there are no actions between conflicts. So either you commit to a conflict, or you pass, nothing else.

1 minute ago, slowreflex said:

The articles all mention a general pool of tokens, etc. While this might be the case for casual games, I've never seen this actually happen in competitive games. Do you think it will happen in this? Or will people still just keep track of their own stuff?

It can, or you can do it yourself. I've played with people in A:NR in tourneys where they said "Feel free to use my tokens". It is convenient if someone has enough of them, since then you don't have to worry about packing up 2 people's mess of tokens. However, this is not always the case (especially if they spent money on fancy ones), and don't expect your opponent to supply them.

Just now, Yogo Gohei said:

The question is whether or not the general "honor pool" and "fate pool" are limited in size.
I suspect that they are, or else the articles wouldn't be written that way.

Honor pool is limited to 49, since, well, you hit 25 and you win.

I actually imagine there isn't an official "limit" to either of these pools, not as a game mechanic. You can accrue as much fate as you want, but if you get a lot, you probably are not winning, since you are likely not doing anything.

58 minutes ago, Isawa Tasatu said:

It is only useful as a defensive control against military... would be nice if it was a little more multi-use. Not a bad card just saying.

It has uses offensively, too. Obviously there will be action windows to play attachments outside of conflicts (yes, I realize the only examples of attachments we've seen happen during the conflict phase, but they never said you can ONLY attach them during the conflict phase. Plus this card exists, so...), which means you could throw this card on an enemy personality, then go into a military conflict where the pacified character wouldn't be able to defend, making your offensive victory more likely.

I will have three cores so: 120 fate tokens, 150 honor tokens. If those pools are not enough for my private use...

4 minutes ago, Wintersong said:

I will have three cores so: 120 fate tokens, 150 honor tokens. If those pools are not enough for my private use...

If they aren't enough, you should stop eating them.

1 hour ago, Doji Tori said:

Do you think the Togashi Initiate's ability requires a fate from him, any of your characters or the fate pool? Wording seems to indicate the later.

I think its the pool. If it was from him I think it would say remove one of his fate

5 minutes ago, Jedi samurai said:

I think its the pool. If it was from him I think it would say remove one of his fate

I think it might mean, like mentioned above. your fate pool, not the bank. It would make more sense that you would risk a fate to your opponent to make your guy stronger, rather than just increase what is out there.

2 minutes ago, Mirith said:

I think it might mean, like mentioned above. your fate pool, not the bank. It would make more sense that you would risk a fate to your opponent to make your guy stronger, rather than just increase what is out there.

Yes, I think "spend" would indicate its your fate.

The new Lion courtier's taken a page from the Yoritomo playbook, I see. I approve.

Guess who's back... back again...

CHUDA FRICKIN RURI!!!!!!!!

I mean... she's on a crab card now, but still! lol

Yeah, and Dark Virtues are back as well!

Where is the Otomo Courtier? Are they behind that Crane Clan person?

Just now, Tetsuro said:

Where is the Otomo Courtier? Are they behind that Crane Clan person?