20 minutes ago, Tebbo said:No one else is regularly talking to their dead ancestors about stuff or using trained animals in battle.
To each their own but I think you're being a tad disingenuous.
The point of the clan is that they are the most Samurai of Samurai, in a setting of Samurai. This means their distinguishing factor is that they are trying to fit in the best. This, to me, makes for bad storytelling, since the best you can do is use the Lion as a foil to whatever someone else is doing.
Kitsune and Toritaka both have some form of spirit interaction for battle. It is not exactly the same, but I also don't think the whole ancestor thing as being a core clan concept, just something they've picked up. Its like saying that the Agasha/Tamori use potions. Sure, its a thing, but is it what you think of when you think "Dragon Clan". Or the Henshin monks. You don't really think of them when you think "Phoenix".
1 minute ago, JJ48 said:I don't think it's necessarily a problem with the Lion themselves so much as how people tend to portray them.
To me, they seem to suffer in much the same way as Paladins in D&D: you can portray them as interesting characters, but many people instead caricature them as haughty jerks that nobody likes and who go around bullying others.
I agree that they get portrayed badly, but I think it stems in part from their concept as a clan. The interesting Lion characters are the ones who are different, which is counter from their core clan concept. I hope that FFG can develop them into something more interesting.
I realize I am somewhat simplifying the whole "Honor" virtue, but a lot of the time it means "Do what your Leader/Daimyo/Emperor tells you, regardless of personal misgivings or risk to yourself". Not always, and there is nuance to it, but the lion are usually portrayed as these decisions are black and white.