THE FAQ IS HERE

By Darth Sanguis, in Star Wars: Armada

Link or didn't happen

#teamorange

Edited by Eggzavier

and now that I read it, I can safely put myself in the "people that will be disappointed if there are no big changes" group

And I'm very disappointed :(

ZOMFG

WOO

Oh yes, Snipe Reversal. Love it.

WAS THAT SO FAQING HARD, FFG!?!?!?

Q: If a squadron with snipe is engaged and another squadron is at distance 2, can it attack the squadron at distance 2?

A: Yes. However, if the squadron with snipe is engaged with a squadron with escort, it cannot attack another squadron that lacks escort.

Duh.

Just now, Drasnighta said:

Oh yes, Snipe Reversal. Love it.

Saw that coming a mile away. Glad it was reversed.

And yet they STILL somehow don't answer the XX9-APT-FCT question.

Lol, love it.

Classic.

Edited by Eggzavier

Oh glory be, dat DT ruling.

Just now, Eggzavier said:

And yet they STILL somehow don't answer the XX9-APT Gunnery question.

Lol, love it.

Classic.

yet it tells us that the standard crit effect doesn't count.

Man, that card just keeps getting worse

AFFM stacks with Indy . Glad they just ruled it simple.

Hahahaha no flotillas-related errata at all!

The forum is going to go up in flames sometime today...

Michael-Jackson-Popcorn.gif

1 minute ago, Ardaedhel said:

AFFM stacks with Indy . Glad they just ruled it simple.

as if people still use Indy

Q: Can a player voluntarily remove ships or squadrons from his fleet to reduce his fleet-point value?

A: Yes. However, ships or squadrons removed in this manner are treated as destroyed. The player does not recover resource points from their fleet-point value. Cards with unique names(such as title upgrade cards) that have been eliminated in this way cannot be purchased again by any player during the campaign.

Just now, Snipafist said:

Hahahaha no flotillas-related errata at all!

The forum is going to go up in flames sometime today...

Michael-Jackson-Popcorn.gif

Not at all. We all expected any big errata like that to come after Worlds.

Must be Fake. cannot be that it comes out this early.

1 minute ago, WuFame said:

Not at all. We all expected any big errata like that to come after Worlds.

You expect to get something else within the next 6 months + 1 Week, huh?

Because that appears to an anniversary date of sorts.

The ruling on Dangerous Territory is a different kind of stupid.

Just now, Drasnighta said:

You expect to get something else within the next 6 months + 1 Week, huh?

Because that appears to an anniversary date of sorts.

I wouldn't put money on FFG doing anything predictable, but I would not have bet that FFG would shake the meta up two weeks before Worlds.

Also, they finally answered my Contested Outpost question from over a year ago. SCORE

We waited this long for stuff we already knew?

The only thing that surprised me was the DT ruling.

I love the CC ruling so I can discard ships n squads. That really opens up fleet building.

I feel like they got FCT wrong? Now I can't use FCT to deal 2 face ups with APT and the standard? Only the APT is face up? Am I reading this right?

What is FFG trying to clarify with Admonition? "A ship equipped with Admonition can discard a single defense token while defending." The card says you can discard a token.

Meh. I'm disappointed. Shouldn't have taken this long. But this does show they really screwed up CC. Hopefully next time they write the rules more clearly.