54 minutes ago, Captain Lackwit said:If I make a claim, I can always back it up.
old news
54 minutes ago, Captain Lackwit said:If I make a claim, I can always back it up.
old news
4 hours ago, Marinealver said:old news
yeah you say that but the tweet is literally from April 14th of this year
on top of that it discredits your claim
Just now, Captain Lackwit said:yeah you say that but the tweet is literally from April 14th of this year
on top of that it discredits your claim
claim? You mean my prediction that her character is probably going to die in episode 8, or the fact that the trailer does not necessarily have scenes that are in the finally product (which was the case for the last movie)?
2 hours ago, Marinealver said:claim? You mean my prediction that her character is probably going to die in episode 8, or the fact that the trailer does not necessarily have scenes that are in the finally product (which was the case for the last movie)?
No. You were up in a tizzy about them CGI-ing in Leia in IX.
Just now, Captain Lackwit said:No. You were up in a tizzy about them CGI-ing in Leia in IX.
No I said that was not going to happen, Disney tried but it was obvious that they couldn't get the consent of her family, which at the time now holds all legal propriety of the late Carrie Fischer hence the "except for the fact it won't".
No they are not going to CGI Carrie, her family won't allow for it. So the obvious thing to do is kill off her character with a little bit of editing and a couple of re-shoots (that don't have the character General Leia in them) or recast her character to a different actress (which could appear just as awkward as CGI Leia).
The "tizzy" is when people got upset because I reminded them that none of the scenes from the first trailer of Rogue One were in the movie. So when I see trailers for movies Rogue One reminded me that they are just a marketing tool and nothing from the movie has to be legally in them. At least the movie was still good and it wasn't complete BullShot trailer like Alien's Colonial Marines.
1 hour ago, Marinealver said:
No I said that was not going to happen, Disney tried but it was obvious that they couldn't get the consent of her family, which at the time now holds all legal propriety of the late Carrie Fischer hence the "except for the fact it won't".
No they are not going to CGI Carrie, her family won't allow for it. So the obvious thing to do is kill off her character with a little bit of editing and a couple of re-shoots (that don't have the character General Leia in them) or recast her character to a different actress (which could appear just as awkward as CGI Leia).
The "tizzy" is when people got upset because I reminded them that none of the scenes from the first trailer of Rogue One were in the movie. So when I see trailers for movies Rogue One reminded me that they are just a marketing tool and nothing from the movie has to be legally in them. At least the movie was still good and it wasn't complete BullShot trailer like Alien's Colonial Marines.
Whoa now hold on okay I was wrong there, but there is something else- many of the things from trailers were abandoned during reshoots.
That, and a lot of what we saw in TFA's trailers were present. One example of a reshoot was the whole bit where Jyn was atop the tower, facing the TIE. An X-Wing was gonna blow it sky high but they decided that was too close to the AT-ACT sequence, which I agree with. So a TIE Striker just comes in and messes stuff up.
A good 50% of the Scarif raid itself was reshot as well. Out of all media, Rogue One itself is the least consistent with the events therein. The bit where Jyn is walking out to the shore? That wasn't her Imperial outfit. Some stuff changed.