6 hours ago, Ginkapo said:Kallus range is all that stands out to me on the Raider II, and then Impetus.
5 hours ago, pt106 said:Don't forget Ruthless Strategists
![]()
Yep, those are the main appeals to me of the Raider-II at the moment. In those regards it can be better but I don't find the trade-off to be worth it usually. Again, I'd love to change my mind about the Raider-II as it's one of the few Imperial ships where I say "nope, basically not worth it 99% of the time."
4 hours ago, Alzer said:Raider 1s still have two blue dice out the front, and I'm OK with some black dice tagging along as well.
I am likewise super excited to put some nice racks on my ships. If only raiders iis had ordnance slots....
Actually my dream "fix" to Raider-IIs would simply be to change all their anti-ship dice to blue (maybe +1 or +2 points too, if necessary, but I'd largely prefer to not touch points unless it proved too strong a change). That's all it would take. 4 blue out the front and 2 blue out the sides and they'd be great recipients of SW7 Ion Batteries and would be swell for stalking flotillas (concentrate fire hopefully for accuracy+4 damage or double-accuracy+3 damage+ram). Raider-Is would be superior at burst damage and more lethal short-ranged flak but Raider-IIs would be better mid-ranged skirmishers.
Edited by Snipafisttypo!