5 minutes ago, Ginkapo said:Konstantine IN DA HAUS
Actually...there are admirals less popular than Konstantine...
Vassal Summer 2017 Tournament
Just now, Green Knight said:Actually...there are admirals less popular than Konstantine...
11 of them
15 minutes ago, Green Knight said:Actually...there are admirals less popular than Konstantine...
Garm
Just PM'd you my stand-by emergency list GK! Thanks!
7 minutes ago, Truthiness said:Garm
There are admirals less popular than him too...
36 minutes ago, Ginkapo said:Konstantine IN DA HAUS
No. It might be Sloane.
She is new and she is great.
9 minutes ago, Green Knight said:There are admirals less popular than him too...
Tarkin. I was one of the only who was playing him.
16 minutes ago, Tokra said:No. It might be Sloane.
She is new and she is great.
Anticipating a Sloane-storm, although I'm now doubting that considering that that wouldn't be an unexpected outcome.
1 minute ago, ManInTheBox said:Anticipating a Sloane-storm, although I'm now doubting that considering that that wouldn't be an unexpected outcome.
Its a Tagge-Storm to counter the non existant Sloane Storm.
Just now, Ginkapo said:Its a Tagge-Storm to counter the non existant Sloane Storm.
Tagge-tornado?
42 minutes ago, Ginkapo said:Its a Tagge-Storm to counter the non existant Sloane Storm.
Rieekan all the way down.
Sloane cordially thanks you for the buff @Drasnighta.
Edit:
I looked at the Summer FAQ spreadsheet, and I think @Drasnighta did an excellent job.
I also happen to think the ruling on Sloane gives her a significant boost.
Edited by Warlord Zepnick1 hour ago, Green Knight said:There are admirals less popular than him too...
Clearly must be Tagge then. As for most popular, I have to wonder if some of you are piggybacking on my new found love for Madine...
14 minutes ago, Warlord Zepnick said:Sloane cordially thanks you for the buff @Drasnighta.
This is a great way to make sure that people don't volunteer to help you have fun pushing around digital plastic spaceships again.
I'm trying to understand why you believe Sloane prevents players from spending defense tokens? Sloane's ability to spend dice for tokens occurs in an entirely separate part of the attack step than the defender spending them for defense? In order for that to work, Sloane would need to spend her accuracy results after the spend/modify dice step?
Edited by thecactusman1750 minutes ago, thecactusman17 said:I'm trying to understand why you believe Sloane prevents players from spending defense tokens? Sloane's ability to spend dice for tokens occurs in an entirely separate part of the attack step than the defender spending them for defense? In order for that to work, Sloane would need to spend her accuracy results after the spend/modify dice step?
I was solidly in the "this is ridiculous" camp when I first read this one, too, but the arguments here are actually pretty solid. In brief:
RRG pg 4 DEFENSE TOKENS said:A defense token cannot be spent more than once during an attack.
Note the wording distinct from the preceding bullet point:
RRG pg 4 DEFENSE TOKENS said:The defender cannot spend more than one defense token of each type per attack.
Because it's already been spent this attack, it can't be spent again, regardless of who did the spending. This is distinct from the restriction on spending multiple tokens of the same type, because the defender is the only to whom that restriction applies... so Sloane spending one of Luke's braces doesn't lock both, for example.
I personally don't care one way or the other, just presenting the rationale. If you think there's something that was missed in the linked discussion that impacts the resolution, please take it to that thread or pm the Marshal @Green Knight so's not to sidetrack the thread. 
That argument does not make sense because it would immedately disqualify other combos that we know should work, such as Darth Vader and TRCs.
Are you going to turn off Darth Vader TRCs on the Arquitens? Because you have to, assuming they both use the evade token.
18 minutes ago, thecactusman17 said:That argument does not make sense because it would immedately disqualify other combos that we know should work, such as Darth Vader and TRCs.
Are you going to turn off Darth Vader TRCs on the Arquitens? Because you have to, assuming they both use the evade token.
54 minutes ago, Ardaedhel said:I personally don't care one way or the other, just presenting the rationale. If you think there's something that was missed in the linked discussion that impacts the resolution, please take it to that thread or pm the Marshal @Green Knight so's not to sidetrack the thread.
Just now, Ardaedhel said:
Apologies, you are correct.
@Green Knight It says I cannot message you my list.....it says you cannot accept messages.
Edited by SoonerTedDue to numerous reasons, Sloane has been flipped.
Wonderful things to read after a day at hospital, y'know.
@Green Knight - since you can't accept PMs (I'm guessing your box is full) my list is here: http://armadawarlords.hivelabs.solutions/view_list.php?token=102208&key=ef6cd580b6bd8db990f207f204b024a9
Looks like my inbox is full.
Despite clearing out everything before submissions.
I'll do some house cleaning.
Sloane may or may not get a official FAQ entry - in about 6 months - that contravenes what poor tourney FAQ says.
For this tournament, however, you can't spend a token that Sloane already spent (during that attack oc).