Vote for custom Imperial Expansions in the CCL!
I love that most of the submissions have Maarek in them
Was hoping to see a v-wing expansion in there. Maybe none for imperials I guess.
Why the hell is the Missile Boat so expensive???
1 hour ago, ObiWonka said:Why the hell is the Missile Boat so expensive???
I was wondering the same thing
4 hours ago, ObiWonka said:Why the hell is the Missile Boat so expensive???
Its parents were a large gold brick and a slice of lemon...
The Yeah or neah sometimes were just too much. There were some that I sad sort of but instead felt like I had to vote them down.
7 hours ago, Marinealver said:The Yeah or neah sometimes were just too much. There were some that I sad sort of but instead felt like I had to vote them down.
Yeah; it might be hard for some people, but I think the 'no' option is pretty important, since I think that a strong negative opinion against an expansion is important to record in the vote. It kinda sucks to downvote someone, and to be downvoted, but I think it makes the process a healthier one at the end of the day
I think it could be nice in future to use the rating systems a lot of surveys use from -5 (Strongly disapprove), to 0 (Neutral), to +5 (Strongly approve)
But it would make number crunching more work on your end presumably so it could be more effort that it's worth.
But have the degree of saying "I really hate this" compared to "I kind of dislike this" seems useful?
12 hours ago, ObiWonka said:Why the hell is the Missile Boat so expensive???
This.
11 hours ago, VanderLegion said:I was wondering the same thing
Yep.
7 hours ago, Astech said:Its parents were a large gold brick and a slice of lemon...
Must have been.....and it will be unplayable at that cost.
Good gravy!
18 minutes ago, Mangipan said:I think it could be nice in future to use the rating systems a lot of surveys use from -5 (Strongly disapprove), to 0 (Neutral), to +5 (Strongly approve)
But it would make number crunching more work on your end presumably so it could be more effort that it's worth.
But have the degree of saying "I really hate this" compared to "I kind of dislike this" seems useful?
Yeah; I think I could handle that on a spreadsheet without a ton of trouble. If people like this idea I might implement it.
4 hours ago, Babaganoosh said:Yeah; it might be hard for some people, but I think the 'no' option is pretty important, since I think that a strong negative opinion against an expansion is important to record in the vote. It kinda sucks to downvote someone, and to be downvoted, but I think it makes the process a healthier one at the end of the day
Well you have to down vote someone, If you like them all, then you like none of them!
54 minutes ago, Marinealver said:Well you have to down vote someone, If you like them all, then you like none of them!
Technically you could upvote some and 'no opinion' the rest without downvoting anyone 
Yeah I have the exact opposite problem. I have an issue with just voting neutral. I'm an all or nothing kinda guy, so I either love it or hate it. I really have to step back and say to myself, "Is this really that bad or should I just vote neutral?" or "is it really good, or should I vote neutral?"
5 hours ago, VanderLegion said:Technically you could upvote some and 'no opinion' the rest without downvoting anyone
That still lessens the effect of the vote, Haven't you learned by now it is not simply what you vote for but how you vote that counts.
24 minutes ago, Marinealver said:That still lessens the effect of the vote, Haven't you learned by now it is not simply what you vote for but how you vote that counts.
Just pointing out that there's something between downvoting some and upcoming all. A no opinion is still less than an upvote. Pretty sure I voted no opinion on a couple that I didn't love enough to vote for, but did t dislike enough to vote agaainst
Hows this looking so far?
1 hour ago, Rakaydos said:Hows this looking so far?
Right now, the Star Courier is in a pretty comfortable lead for custom ships, with about a 15 point lead over the Scimitar Assault Bomber, and in the aces pack category, the Imperial Terrors pack has a very slim lead over the Champions of the Empire pack, but those two have comfortable leads over the other packs. There have been 107 votes so far; which is great!
Only two days left to vote!
Last day to vote! Polls close at midnight EST
Is there anyway for us to see how our expansion did if we don't win? Or is that knowledge lost to time?
I'll be releasing the vote totals after the vote is over
The winning entries for Imperial Expansions are:
custom ship: Star Courier LINK: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BxGM5RCgYyo9MG1vUFp0WUFYQkU
aces pack: Imperial Terrors (TIE fighter and TIE Punisher) LINK: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Rxg47TgOtV38qLzvakAE0IRedEuOGAQLfvnznZK5CAg
Start thinking about revisions! I will post .eon file links soon.
Edited by BabaganooshSome early thoughts for anyone looking to make changes-
Tie Interdictor should probably cost 0 points. At 2 points, you are basically paying a fair price for the ability, and since it should be a "fix", it should probably come in at 0 to make up for the struggling chassis it is connected to.
7 points for Baradium Missile seems too much to me. You have to take into account that assault missiles see very little play, and homing missiles, which also have a benefit of negating evade tokens and doesn't require you to discard the lock, comes in at 5 points. I think 5 points would be fair if the attack is intended to do an additional damage to the target (as it currently says "each ship at range 1" and not "each other ship at range 1"). If that isn't intended, I might even drop it as low as 4.
So.... Can we see how everyone did?
I'll get a link to the stats, but it will be a little while. Probably up by this evening