Thanks for creating such a positive response to what many consider to a common complaint!
Errata cards for your use
On 7.03.2017 at 1:03 PM, citruscannon said:
![]()
![]()
Wait... since when Daredevil is only 1 point upgrade? I've checked the latest FAQ before posting this, so I'm pretty sure it's still 3 points. If it was only 1 point, it would be at last affordable
Nevertheless, great job with the cards, thanks!
Edited by JeduIf there was ever another pin needed, its on this thread. Awesome work!
These are gorgeous cards! Thank you for the hard work!
Nice job on the layout. Looking forward to the PDF to print on cardstock for me and other players in the area.
9 hours ago, Jedu said:Wait... since when Daredevil is only 1 point upgrade? I've checked the latest FAQ before posting this, so I'm pretty sure it's still 3 points. If it was only 1 point, it would be at last affordable
![]()
Nevertheless, great job with the cards, thanks!
whoops! I've been triple checking everything for errors but that seems to have slipped through. thanks for the catch!!!!!
I'll fix it and change the picture so people don't run into issues. Handy thing about posting these before collating them as a PDF. I REALLY don't want there to be a single error on any of these, even so much as a typo, so they are actually useable for people.
thanks!
Thank you for your time on this.
Love it!
1 hour ago, citruscannon said:whoops! I've been triple checking everything for errors but that seems to have slipped through. thanks for the catch!!!!!
I'll fix it and change the picture so people don't run into issues. Handy thing about posting these before collating them as a PDF. I REALLY don't want there to be a single error on any of these, even so much as a typo, so they are actually useable for people.
thanks!
I wish it was 1 point!
13 hours ago, citruscannon said:yep no worries, as said when I finish it I'll put them all into a pdf sheet at higher resolution so it's easy to download and use as you like.
on an unrelated note:
I was wondering about just going whole hog, if i've timestamped the cards for a specific FAQ, why not actually go on and include the clarifications on the back, exactly as formatted and written in the FAQ?
examples (Stealth device and feedback array)
Personally, I would rather have this version to make it easier to argue with the other player about the change LOL!. Thank you for your work.
Edited by TurboCoolerThank you for your fantastic effort, Citrus! THIS is how you fix xwing.
19 hours ago, citruscannon said:yep no worries, as said when I finish it I'll put them all into a pdf sheet at higher resolution so it's easy to download and use as you like.
on an unrelated note:
I was wondering about just going whole hog, if i've timestamped the cards for a specific FAQ, why not actually go on and include the clarifications on the back, exactly as formatted and written in the FAQ?
examples (Stealth device and feedback array)
Please do this!
Will that even be legible on a card that is only 2.5 inches tall? Love the idea, but I'm not sure we're going to be able to ready something that small on the printed cards. As it is, the font on the front of these beautiful cards is already pretty small.
This is absolutely not meant to be a complete. I LOVE what you're doing here and can't wait to use these cards.
Edited by SWO Daddy57 minutes ago, SWO Daddy said:Will that even be legible on a card that is only 2.5 inches tall? Love the idea, but I'm not sure we're going to be able to ready something that small on the printed cards. As it is, the font on the front of these beautiful cards is already pretty small.
This is absolutely not meant to be a complete. I LOVE what you're doing here and can't wait to use these cards.
yea, I was worried about it too, I've found the largest text in the FAQ for length (PTL) and reformatted a new version of the back with maximum effort on legibility. Still tweaking the format a bit.
This is it in white and black for comparison. Then alongside it is a card which would also have errata, (palpatine crew) for how I'd try to keep consistency for comparison., but denoting the fact it is also a errata card in red.
This. Is. Beyond. Awesome. Wow.
These are awesome! I have one request as not everyone is going to immediately look on the back of the card, nor do I think everyone will actually print out both sides. Would you add that word Erratum to the front face of the card? Or maybe "Erratum 4.3"? I think it would help these stand out a little more as errata cards.
1 hour ago, jonnyd said:These are awesome! I have one request as not everyone is going to immediately look on the back of the card, nor do I think everyone will actually print out both sides. Would you add that word Erratum to the front face of the card? Or maybe "Erratum 4.3"? I think it would help these stand out a little more as errata cards.
That is a good idea. Even if you only put E 4.3 on the front as real estate is a premium.
6 hours ago, jonnyd said:These are awesome! I have one request as not everyone is going to immediately look on the back of the card, nor do I think everyone will actually print out both sides. Would you add that word Erratum to the front face of the card? Or maybe "Erratum 4.3"? I think it would help these stand out a little more as errata cards.
5 hours ago, Chivenger said:That is a good idea. Even if you only put E 4.3 on the front as real estate is a premium.
yea that sounds like a great idea guys. I'll update this later with the modified format based on suggestions and work my way through the FAQ cards from beginning to end later this weekend.
Man , I can't wait for the final PDF l. Gonna have these printed professionally for sure!
Great Job!!
Please give us your drug! We need the final PDF to print!
Thanks !
These are awesome thanks. Can you update the Emperor to the latest text?
On 3/7/2017 at 1:56 AM, citruscannon said:
![]()
![]()
They changed the article text and the FAQ on page 17 to "you must change 1 of your dice results"
To "you much change 1 of its die results"
Yes they didn't change the FAQ on page 3, so now there are two official versions of the card in the same FAQ.
This is amazing! Can't wait for the PDF! Many thanks!
12 hours ago, Ken at Sunrise said:These are awesome thanks. Can you update the Emperor to the latest text?
They changed the article text and the FAQ on page 17 to "you must change 1 of your dice results"
To "you much change 1 of its die results"
![]()
Yes they didn't change the FAQ on page 3, so now there are two official versions of the card in the same FAQ.
lol haha yep no problem. I'm currently writing up version 2 of these cards in high definition. thanks for alerting me to the change
I don't mean to bug, i was just wondering if there were any updates. I'm very eager for these.
Out of curiosity, which version of the back faces do you plan to include in the pdf? I personally prefer the generic Erratum back faces over the clarification versions. Maybe include both? Either way, great job and thanks.