Due to the new FAQ combined with the project's low popularity, it is now canceled.
Hello everone, I present to you my little project: An alternative competitve format for X-Wing.
Due to the new FAQ combined with the project's low popularity, it is now canceled.
Hello everone, I present to you my little project: An alternative competitve format for X-Wing.
After playing MtG for a number of years in different formats, I rather see a simple ban list. By simple, I mean all named pilots are banned. There's your UnderUsed format!
Wow. So you like the Ghost a lot, have Imperial stuff listed with Rebels, and think Ryad is fine, but that Solo isn't.
I'd find someone a bit more impartial to make this ban list for you. A like the idea, not real pleased on the execution
- Without named pilots.
- Every card is unique.
- Without EPT.
- Just barebone ships.
- No turrets.
- Only small ships.
- Only standard arc ships.
- Max 30 points per ship.
Any and all of them (or combinationts) bring the same:
<< provide a breath of fresh air for competitive players by giving you an experience with less... create a vastly diffrent environment, it would create it's own metagame- that's simply the way competitive games work. >>
That you ask, but in an easiest and simpler way, as Kubernes says. And event more important, a less biased one.
Otherwise...
1 hour ago, Lobokai said:Wow. So you like the Ghost a lot, have Imperial stuff listed with Rebels, and think Ryad is fine, but that Solo isn't.
I'd find someone a bit more impartial to make this ban list for you. A like the idea, not real pleased on the execution
Wow, you're a really mean person. But anyway:
-Ghost pilots are on borderline because I expect UU to have a higher amount of raw red dice (more low-cost generics), which counters immobile 0 agi ships. Additionally, it lost a lot of power because Biggs, FCS and TLT are banned.
-The imperial large ships were listed in rebels due to a copying error.
-Ryad was an overlook and is now corrected.
-Han is banned because he used to be a major meta threat. Possibly an unnecessary ban because most of fat han's tools are banned, but I'm being careful about PS9 pilots. Might unban him in the future.
Edited by Elavion1 hour ago, Kubernes said:After playing MtG for a number of years in different formats, I rather see a simple ban list. By simple, I mean all named pilots are banned. There's your UnderUsed format!
The problem with a simple banlist like that is that it will not work for x-wing.
To answer this particular suggestion: three x7 Glaives and 4 TLT Ys both slip through.
57 minutes ago, Draconis Hegemonia said:- Without named pilots.
- Every card is unique.
- Without EPT.
- Just barebone ships.
- No turrets.
- Only small ships.
- Only standard arc ships.
- Max 30 points per ship.
Any and all of them (or combinationts) bring the same:
<< provide a breath of fresh air for competitive players by giving you an experience with less... create a vastly diffrent environment, it would create it's own metagame- that's simply the way competitive games work. >>
That you ask, but in an easiest and simpler way, as Kubernes says. And event more important, a less biased one.
Otherwise...
The problem with this list is that most of those suggestions kill off entire ships, while at the same time letting standard stuff through. They also take away a good chunk of the game's diversity.
If you use multiple restrictions from this list, you end up with very little variety.
Edit: whoops, double post. Still getting used to the new forums.
Edited by Elavion2 hours ago, Lobokai said:Wow. So you like the Ghost a lot, have Imperial stuff listed with Rebels, and think Ryad is fine, but that Solo isn't.
I'd find someone a bit more impartial to make this ban list for you. A like the idea, not real pleased on the execution
1 hour ago, Elavion said:Wow, you're a really mean person. But anyway:
-Ghost pilots are on borderline because I expect UU to have a higher amount of raw red dice (more low-cost generics), which counters immobile 0 agi ships. Additionally, it lost a lot of power because Biggs, FCS and TLT are banned.
-The imperial large ships were listed in rebels due to a copying error.
-Ryad was an overlook and is now corrected.
-Han is banned because he used to be a major meta threat. Possibly an unnecessary ban because most of fat han's tools are banned, but I'm being careful about PS9 pilots. Might unban him in the future.
Without x7 I don't think ryad really needs a a ban. X7 is what makes the defenders so crazy good right now
/D is no joke either.
Banned - Anything that's fun!
I tried something like that earlier but it wasn't too popular. Instead of banning whole cards I just worked on banning pilot-upgrade combos based upon top brackets of premier tournaments. For pilots that often did not equip upgrade (i.e. Academy Pilot) cards I just made it a requirement to put an upgrade on it in attempt to encourage alternative builds outside the established meta.
Even though not a single card was banned, closest was IG-2000 but there wasn't a combo with C and IG-2000 on it it still did not gain any popularity because banning cards is rather a strict restriction.
I think what would be better is what FFG did with Android: Netrunner where they made certain cards cost 1 more influence no matter what faction you were playing. Now spending influence is not the same as spending squadron points but something similar like making certain pilots or upgrades cost 1 more point. It acts more like a softer ban. I tested this out with a theoretical list and compare it to the Seattle Regional and found only 1 list had to redesign their list. The others just had to trim off an extra upgrade that was more of a filler and not a solid part of the build like a seismic charge. There was one list that didn't have any of the power pilots/upgrades. So I thought it will work but I learned it is very difficult to convince players to try something other than 100 point standard . Even Escalation and Epic is a hard time getting players to come to the table.
Still instead of a Ban I think a simple point increase list would do better.
Edited by Marinealver