1 minute ago, Green Rabid Monkey said:Heck why not just make this if we are going with Uglies now...
Dat ain't Cool RAM-SHACK... more like silly-ass-crack!
![]()
1 minute ago, Green Rabid Monkey said:Heck why not just make this if we are going with Uglies now...
Dat ain't Cool RAM-SHACK... more like silly-ass-crack!
![]()
Don't make me get Mega Maid out....
4 minutes ago, Green Rabid Monkey said:Don't make me get Mega Maid out....
SUPER NERD...
![]()

5 hours ago, Stoneface said:Ok, showing my lack of Star Wars background. What is an "Ugly"?
http://www.afewmaneuvers.com/topic/2628-ships-uglies/




Oh, please no!
Uglies were introduced already in Lego Star Wars: The Freemakers. Already cannon. I may have missed it but I didn't see Manaroo but Dengar was a bunch of laughs.
While a model design challenge, a modifiable ugly with a linked upgrade title would be a bit funny.
Freemakers is not considered Canon as per Pablo Hidalgo.
18 minutes ago, Wiredin said:Freemakers is not considered Canon as per Pablo Hidalgo.
Oh...good point. Apparently I read a bad or un-informed article when it was coming out.
I assume that is because it makes jokes and slight modifications for fun. However, it is collaborated with the Story Group and requires their approval. So while Uglies is not canon it sure is approved by the Story Group.
Edited by rilesman
Freemakers does need authorization to do things by the story group, but Pablo has stated on his twitter that this does not necessarily mean things are Canon. Same thing with "Galaxy of Hero's". Pablo stated that HK47, Darth Nihilus are still not considered part of the canon story even though they have appeared in the game. Which makes me question if Force Commanders Tie Defender is officially a canon reveal as well.
I'm guessing the same way that just because E-Wings showed up in the latest Armada release does not mean they are automatically canon either. ![]()
1 hour ago, gabe69velasquez said:
Now why would anyone willingly put together those monstrosities when it would seem they have the parts they need to make the actual production ships instead. Then if one of those uglies had such amazing performance why would it only remain as an ugly instead of entering production as an actual model.
Uglies are just ugly in most every sense of the word. As one-ofs they may make some sense but there should never be any kind of "standardization" and if there were there should be parts of some ships that you just NEVER see in an ugly.
PS. While I may not be a fan of uglies these are some well done customs.
Edited by StevenOWell some uglies had their advantages. Y-TIE had heavy firepower and Death Seeds were practically production line fighter.
4 hours ago, Green Rabid Monkey said:Heck why not just make this if we are going with Uglies now...
I thought they already had... isn't that the G1-A ??
5 hours ago, gabe69velasquez said:
I like that x-ceptor!
15 hours ago, Joe Boss Red Seven said:
Could be worse:
8 minutes ago, Robin Graves said:I like that x-ceptor!



.
On 8/30/2015 at 3:10 PM, Winn said:Hi!
I would like to present you a collection of custom ships!
X AdvancedB/X-WingB/B-WingX-ceptorB/X-ceptor
3 minutes ago, gabe69velasquez said:
So... an ARC-170?
Actually I consider the TIE defender, star viper and punishing one to be uglies. I'm sorry, if you like these ships that's fine, but to me they look like a TIE with a bunch of unnececary wings atttached, an exploded general grievous and some weird ass sith millenium falcon respectivly.
15 hours ago, Admiral Deathrain said:I don't think we got any comic only stuff, yet. Would make for a neat conversion, though!
You mean like an E-wing?
16 minutes ago, ObiWonka said:20 minutes ago, gabe69velasquez said:
So... an ARC-170?
So... no one's taught you how to count? lol.
How many guns does an ARC-170 have? and how many does this ship have?
Edited by gabe69velasquez3 minutes ago, gabe69velasquez said:So... no one's taught you how to count? lol.
How many guns does an ARC-170 have? and how many does this ship have?
So... no one's taught you how to have a sense humor yet?
5 minutes ago, ObiWonka said:So... no one's taught you how to have a sense humor yet?
I don't think you meant it as a joke, you're just covering you butt. Or you're not as funny as you think you are. That's not like a ARC-170.


10 minutes ago, gabe69velasquez said:I don't think you meant it as a joke, you're just covering you butt.
If I spelled the joke out (same number of wings, turret, technically multiple crew seats) it wouldn't be funny. But now you've gone and ruined it for everyone. I don't know what you're trying to prove with those pictures, either. The ARC-170's wings also fold, and it, too, has an underside.