Love the idea, and the card art... I do think it'd be best as a System or Tech slot, rather than a modification. But that's more just my feeling than any reason I care to argue!
Love the idea, and the card art... I do think it'd be best as a System or Tech slot, rather than a modification. But that's more just my feeling than any reason I care to argue!
See, I would make it as System or Tech ^^ But Modification is allright too.
If its a mod slot, Turr With that VI and autothrusters might be nasty (Or Turr with PTL)
5 hours ago, Do I need a Username said:If its a mod slot, Turr With that VI and autothrusters might be nasty (Or Turr with PTL)
Yes. I know thematically it makes more sense to put it tech or system, but modification is so much versatile.
13 hours ago, gabe69velasquez said:Did you already make something like this, or do you have any use for it? And yes I know for some scum ships that means 3 modifications.
I don't know... I never felt the need to give Scum more modification slots.
8 hours ago, Odanan said:I don't know... I never felt the need to give Scum more modification slots.
It's thematic, it adds to the number of illicit possibilities through modifications, which a lot of illicits are really.
QuoteHan Solo: She'll make point five past lightspeed. She may not look like much, but she's got it where it counts, kid. I've made a lot of special modifications myself.
Edited by gabe69velasquez
52 minutes ago, gabe69velasquez said:It's thematic, it adds to the number of illicit possibilities through modifications, which a lot of illicit are really.
From that perspective, yes, it's very cool.
may I include it in my CCL Scum submission?
So, I have a couple of days before submitting my Most Wanted II to the CCL Season 2 .
Do you guys like better this or this ? (think about versatility, thematic and gameplay)
2 hours ago, Odanan said:So, I have a couple of days before submitting my Most Wanted II to the CCL Season 2 .
Do you guys like better this or this ? (think about versatility, thematic and gameplay)
I like the first one better (increase speed by one). Mostly because it's something I think I would enjoy flying.
57 minutes ago, Bullox said:I like the first one better (increase speed by one). Mostly because it's something I think I would enjoy flying.
I like it too.
I used that same mechanic (increase speed of manuevers) on a new HWK Title (Nomad's Pride) to give the HWK the option to fly much faster/better. I've playtested it a few times and it's pretty awesome. The effect isn't as pronounced with the K-fighter, because it doesn't have many reds that can be upgraded, but I think you'll like it.
First!
Edited by Odanan
20 hours ago, Odanan said:First!
Edited by gabe69velasquez
On 5/8/2017 at 7:53 AM, Odanan said:So, I have a couple of days before submitting my Most Wanted II to the CCL Season 2 .
Do you guys like better this or this ? (think about versatility, thematic and gameplay)
I don't know if it occurred to you, but the boost-system combo is more like a TIE Striker, which is more maneuverable as a result.
Oh, you're talking about this:
http://screenrant.com/star-wars-8-first-look-at-kylo-rens-the-last-jedi-tie-fighter/
I thought it was something you made up.
It's going to be an awesome addition to XMG when it comes out.
2 hours ago, gabe69velasquez said:
I don't know if it occurred to you, but the boost-system combo is more like a TIE Striker, which is more maneuverable as a result.
Well, with the game so bloated, we are running out of options... I just want to avoid the free-action creep and the "condition" abomination.
15 hours ago, Odanan said:18 hours ago, gabe69velasquez said:On 5/8/2017 at 7:53 AM, Odanan said:So, I have a couple of days before submitting my Most Wanted II to the CCL Season 2 .
Do you guys like better this or this ? (think about versatility, thematic and gameplay)
I don't know if it occurred to you, but the boost-system combo is more like a TIE Striker, which is more maneuverable as a result.
Well, with the game so bloated, we are running out of options... I just want to avoid the free-action creep and the "condition" abomination.
Well neither of those was one of the choices, so I'm not sure why you bring them up, but what I meant was I was leaning towards your system and boost version, rather than your plus one speed version.
I was looking at this escape pod and I have to tell you I don't understand the last phrase, if possible, when is that not possible? Wouldn't it be simpler to say a ship range 1-2 gains 2 crew slots and you can equip your crew on them, maybe discard 2 upgrades there, or do you mean a friendly ship with crew slots and you are swapping crew? You do know there is an escape pod token right?
Also there's this if you want to use the whole flag. It's easy enough to expand if you need to.
Also, "Rey Starkiller" ....In case you need another custom idea, and you want another "First."
Edited by gabe69velasquez
Yeah, that Escape Pod needs a big overhaul.
Rey Starkiller!? What the heck would man that?
1 hour ago, gabe69velasquez said:I was looking at this escape pod and I have to tell you I don't understand the last phrase, if possible, when is that not possible? Wouldn't it be simpler to say a ship range 1-2 gains 2 crew slots and you can equip your crew on them, maybe discard 2 upgrades there, or do you mean a friendly ship with crew slots and you are swapping crew? You do know there is an escape pod token right?
I just assumed it meant that the ship receiving/rescuing the crew had to have vacant crew slots.
5 hours ago, Bullox said:I just assumed it meant that the ship receiving/rescuing the crew had to have vacant crew slots.
That was the intention...
2 minutes ago, Odanan said:5 hours ago, Bullox said:I just assumed it meant that the ship receiving/rescuing the crew had to have vacant crew slots.
That was the intention...
Sorry, I just always use my crew slots, it hadn't occurred to me to leave any blank on other ships.
1 hour ago, gabe69velasquez said:
Sorry, I just always use my crew slots, it hadn't occurred to me to leave any blank on other ships.
But you are right. The "if possible" was lousy, anyway.