I'm pitching my thoughts in on how the recent errata works between Reinforcements and the new style of counting VPs.

https://corsecacademy.blogspot.com/2017/01/recent-errata-effects-and-controversy.html

There is kind of no point in arguing about it anymore until the official answer comes along.

Article is wrong. Reinforcements doesn't make the figure "undefeated" you just put it back into play.

We really don't know either way. The document we saw was not the finished thing.

Yea I'm with Cremate, I can see it being interpreted either way, and there is little value in arguing either way until we get clarification

And now the new document is here

Just read it through before facepalming.

Right, so it looks like my suspicions are confirmed:

exact wordings:

CALCULATING VICTORY POINTS

A player earns victory points during a game each time he or she defeats an opponent’s figure or through card or mission effects.

When a figure is defeated, the opposing player scores victory points equal to that figure’s figure cost (see “Figure Cost” in the “Rules Updates” section of the FAQ).

Players do not score victory points equal to the deployment cost of a group when the last figure in that group is defeated.

When the last figure in a group is defeated, if that group had an attachment, the opposing player scores victory points equal to that attachment’s cost.

DEFEATED FIGURES

When a figure is defeated, the owner of that figure places it on its respective Deployment card.

If a defeated figure is placed back on the map, the owner places a strain token on that figure’s deployment card to track the previous defeat.

Which means I get VP and may spend it as soon as I kill off your trooper, which means I can score potentially up to 15VP on a twice reinforced eStorm

With that wording, it looks very clear that you get the points for killing a reinforced figure twice.