I don't think rules interpretation should be left open to "common sense," considering how much that differs from person to person. In fact, there shouldn't be any interpretation at all. It's a shame that X-Wing is still the band-aided mess it was when I stopped playing, and I certainly wouldn't use it as a point of comparison over Magic's comprehensive rule book.
I have a lot of respect for the quality of product that FFG routinely churns out, but it's always seemed to me that they deliberately ignore what everyone else in the market is doing. If you know that there's a company with 20+ years of successful game-building and you don't put in the time and energy to study their habits, then at best you're making a half-assed effort to create and promote your own product. Establishing a judge program now certainly would be putting the cart before the horse, but only because there isn't anything worth adjudicating at present. The BRB is what, 20 some-odd pages? Let FFG print something more comprehensive and then we can talk about implementing a judge program. Or, you know, they can just tack on an FAQ entry explaining how layers work...
Edited by WonderWAAAGH