The Imperial Class deck "Armored Onslaught" contains the card "Reactive Armor". It has this text:
While defending, if you roll an [Evade] result on a black die, apply +2 Block to the defense results.
Verena's "Create Opening" has this text:
Exhaust this card while a hostile figure adjacent to you is defending to apply -1 [block] or -1[Evade] to the defense results.
So, assume Verena attacks an adjacent unit and that unit has the Reactive Armor. The Imperial player rolls an [Evade] result.
Verena decides to use "Create Opening" to apply -1 [Evade]. Does the Imperial Player still receive the +2 Block?
From the Rules Reference, there are 2 entries for timing-specific conflicts:
Conflicts:
During a campaign, mission rules are resolved first, followed by
effects from the Imperial player, then effects from the Rebel players.
Timing:
During an attack, in both a campaign and a skirmish, resolve
mission rules first, followed by effects triggered by the attacker,
then effects triggered by the defender.
The question though is that is if Verena uses Create Opening to remove the [Evade], does that mean that the Imperial Player no longer gets the +2 Block since there is no longer an Evade? Or does the +2 Block get applied immediately (and permanently) upon the roll (or immediately in step #4 in "steps of an attack" since it's not worded as an 'action' that you need to trigger).
It really comes down to asking *when* the Reactive Armor is checked & when it applies it's effect.
It's also worth noting that the text on Reactive Armor is slightly different then the Nexu. The Nexu reads:
While defending, apply +1 [block] to the defense results for each [Evade] result.
I'm not sure if that is significant or not. The Nexu doesn't mention the 'roll', it only references the 'result'. Do these cards work the same?
Edited by hyveedoughboy