Is there any kind of precedent for this?I would read it the player must use a focus token if able.
Therefore he is blocked from using Accuracy Corrector (which makes him unable to spend a focus token), until he spends a focus token.
I.e anything that overrules the general rule that a player with multiple effects that share the same timing trigger can be resolved in any order?
It comes down to you being able to spend a focus at the start of the attack. It says you MUST spend it if you are able too.... And at a point in the attack you are able to.
It's the equivalent to your mum telling you you must go down the shops to pick up some milk. And you saying I'm sorry I can't do that because since you told me to do that I've flushed the door keys down the lavvy.
There really is no kind of precedent for this card. has any card before said, you must spend a token in this period of the game. It's terribly vague, and could be read a variety of ways.
As soon as he enters the "attacker modifies attack dice" step, he is able to spend a focus token. And since HSCP "says you MUST spend it if you are able too.... And at [that] point in the attack you are able to."
Edited by Klutz