The word twice does not appear on the Special Ops Training card.

So she's great if you cheat, got it.

The word twice does not appear on the Special Ops Training card.

Why is additional = 2?

Take a TIE SF without the title. What can it do? Shoot out the front or shoot out the back. One attack. Just like boba fett in a firespray.

Now add the title. It lets you add a die when you shoot out the front. But if you don't add that extra die, you can make an extra attack out the back. Not two attacks out the back. Just one. In addition to the one you just made out the front.

... why would youhave FIVE. Four is the number for the counting.

A) It may be my second or third favorite star wars ship ever. Period.

B) I also enjoy Epic, even if I hardly ever get to play it.

C) I lost 3 shield tokens, and there's only 4 ships at the time that could accomodate me, B-wing, K-wing, TIE defender, and T-70 single. so I bought the B-wing. So I have 4 for standard tournament play with BBBBZ (when that was meta) and an extra ship for "just in case".

The TIE/sf has three options:

• Make a three die attack from the front.
• Make a two die attack from the back.
• Make a two die attack from the front and a two tie attack from the back.

Four. It can also make a two die attack out the front on its own, if for some reason you want to do that.

Surprised this hasn't been said yet, but guys, just let the Wookie win!

So she's great if you cheat, got it.

I'm just wondering why he didn't use the secret 4 dice turret attack, obviously it's not actually printed on the card. But when did that stop folks doing other stuff not the card either?

So she's great if you cheat, got it.

To be fair it's good when you don't cheat too....

I'm not trying to cheat. Geesh. I'm trying to figure out how to play my new toy. Sorry I'm a dumb a$$.

I'm not trying to cheat. Geesh. I'm trying to figure out how to play my new toy. Sorry I'm a dumb a$$.

Not you're fault, the title card is a bit wordy for my liking.

Is amazing. Holy moly. Vaporized a B-Wing out the back at range 1. Wow!!!

A damaged Bwing?

Certainly shieldless.

Cannot Quickdraw get into range 1 of a full B-wing, and use electronic baffle to trigger a 4 dice attack during the activation phase, then attack again during the combat phase, and deal 4 hits in both attacks while the B-wing rolls a blank in each defense?

Cannot. Cannot. CANNOT.

I'm not trying to cheat. Geesh. I'm trying to figure out how to play my new toy. Sorry I'm a dumb a$$.

Not you're fault, the title card is a bit wordy for my liking.

I disagree. Given the space constraints they're working with, I think its as concise as you could ask for.

Haha making up things? Shooting twice out the back arc? Do you even read the cards before you make these posts?

I'm not trying to cheat. Geesh. I'm trying to figure out how to play my new toy. Sorry I'm a dumb a$$.

Not you're fault, the title card is a bit wordy for my liking.

I disagree. Given the space constraints they're working with, I think its as concise as you could ask for.

I feel it could be more concise but then again there could be a language translation issue if you did.

So she's great if you cheat, got it.

Why should he be a she?

Is amazing. Holy moly. Vaporized a B-Wing out the back at range 1. Wow!!!

A damaged Bwing?

Certainly shieldless.

Cannot Quickdraw get into range 1 of a full B-wing, and use electronic baffle to trigger a 4 dice attack during the activation phase, then attack again during the combat phase, and deal 4 hits in both attacks while the B-wing rolls a blank in each defense?

Cannot. Cannot. CANNOT.

?

So she's great if you cheat, got it.

Why should he be a she?

Umm... Because she is. The FFG article on the TIE/SF specifically refers to her as she .

So she's great if you cheat, got it.

Why should he be a she?

Umm... Because she is. The FFG article on the TIE/SF specifically refers to her as she .

Indeed, jeez starkiller chicks can fly snubfighters too you know.

So she's great if you cheat, got it.

Why should he be a she?

Umm... Because she is. The FFG article on the TIE/SF specifically refers to her as she .

For me Quickdraw is a man - maybe because I have Lucky Luke in my mind when reading the name.

So she's great if you cheat, got it.

Why should he be a she?

Umm... Because she is. The FFG article on the TIE/SF specifically refers to her as she .

Indeed, jeez starkiller chicks can fly snubfighters too you know.

We get an unnaturally high amount of flying chicks lately. I'm sure thats because Mickey Mouse wants it so.

So she's great if you cheat, got it.

Why should he be a she?

Umm... Because she is. The FFG article on the TIE/SF specifically refers to her as she .

For me Quickdraw is a man - maybe because I have Lucky Luke in my mind when reading the name.

Well, she's a she.

Saying a character who is clearly defined as female is a male to you makes about as much sense as me stating "For me, Han Solo is a woman - maybe because I have Hannah Montana in my mind when reading the name."

The empires always had plenty of female pilots, nothing to do with the tight flight suits we issue though...No sir.

So she's great if you cheat, got it.

Why should he be a she?

Umm... Because she is. The FFG article on the TIE/SF specifically refers to her as she .

For me Quickdraw is a man - maybe because I have Lucky Luke in my mind when reading the name.

Well, she's a she.

Saying a character who is clearly defined as female is a male to you makes about as much sense as me stating "For me, Han Solo is a woman - maybe because I have Hannah Montana in my mind when reading the name."

Your reasoning is odd.

So she's great if you cheat, got it.

Why should he be a she?

Umm... Because she is. The FFG article on the TIE/SF specifically refers to her as she .

For me Quickdraw is a man - maybe because I have Lucky Luke in my mind when reading the name.

Well, she's a she.

Saying a character who is clearly defined as female is a male to you makes about as much sense as me stating "For me, Han Solo is a woman - maybe because I have Hannah Montana in my mind when reading the name."

Your reasoning is odd.

No odder than your apparent inability to accept the character is female.