if the base craft weren't so hideously overpriced, we'd have some top-tier contenders with these combos
I'm inclined to agree about the T-70s price tag being way too high. Red Ace and Poe used to see tons of table time because their natural durability lent itself perfectly to the Rebel regen style of play, but that was before the Jumpmasters brought heavy alpha strikes into the competitive scene. There's not a ton you can do with T-70 aces or T-70 generics that isn't paying too high a premium.
I'm starting to think that the cry for "T-65 fix! Omq, QQ!" should probably be "Fix both X-Wing! Omg, QQ!"
it should be
honestly, they both could do with a -2 point cost cut
imo, the big problems are
1.) regeneration is a massive durability swing (see poe)
2.) Biggs is just dandy as is
personally, if I had any control of the situation, I'd do this
1.) all X-wings, T-70 X-wings, E-wings and ARC-170s just get a straight -2 point cost cut (note not Ys, because you have to balance for TLTs)
2.) R5-p9 and R2-d2 get upped to +2 points (so 6 and 5 respectively, but still absolutely worth it )
3.) Biggs alone does not benefit from the point cost (not unprecedented, see also Ten Nub and Rhymer for examples...except in this case the pilot ability is actually worth the point cost increase )
just to open room up in lists for ships that aren't r2-d2 Corran/Norra/Poe (or r5-p9 poe) and Biggs
Edited by ficklegreendice