Should I point out the folly of basing game info off of a Lego set?

Should I point out the folly of basing game info off of a Lego set?

The body of the thing is pretty obviously WAY larger than it should be, by any stretch of the imagination.

A 'storage compartment' seems an odd enough idea, but whatever, it shows there is at least *something* back there. (Sure looks like room for another entire seat, or ordnance, but I guess nobody consulted me, so...)

Why does it come with a rebel in 'endor' gear?

As a explicit planetary garrison ground support combat vehicle with such a large hull and only one crew I would await means to drop bombs ... but not a storage room for personal belongings or whatever this should be.

On the other hand - as a LEGO designer I am happy to have the opportunity to create those little storage possibilities the kids love to put in the extra LEGO parts of the figures that came within the box.

And this tells me that the Disney designers made the Tie Striker to look different - even if there is no technical reason to make the body twice as long as it needed to be.

So yeah ... Disney design space crap.

Pretty much every new star wars toy that's not an action figure has "Storage".

This is not part of the starship.

Pretty much every new star wars toy that's not an action figure has "Storage".

This is not part of the starship.

Especially when it's so obvious the thing is PLAINLY some kind of strike bomber...