Spun out into it's own thread as so not to clog the Statistic thread with side talk. . . .
I don't really blame FFG on the lack of original content. I think for the most part it's the fault of the fanbase. The things people are wanting the most (or at least the most vocal about wanting to get) are things that was covered in previous games and material. No one is creating 10 page long threads demanding that FFG make a planet book full of fresh new planets. They are however creating 10 pages long threads demanding Mandalorian material.
The greater bulk of what people seem to want is FFG stats on old EU/canon material. So FFG seems to be giving us that. They sprinkle in newish stuff. They explore things that were just footnotes before hand. But overall they are pretty much giving us what we demand, stats on stuff we already know about.
Okay Peanut Gallery, lets test this hypothesis (with our admittedly small sample to work from) - lets say that you have two announcements sitting on your desk. One is a Tatooine Sector sourcebook with Jawas and Tuskens and Ryloth and Geonosis and whatnot. (or if you prefer, a Mandalorian sourcebook, or a Corporate Sector Authority coursebook - something that details a facet of the EU)
The other announcement is something like Lords of the Expanse - Not necessarily a "Nobles In Space" game, but an all new region of space with new worlds, new races, new cultures, new politics and intrigues. A fully fleshed out region not featured elsewhere in the expanded universe.
Both are otherwise equal - same page counts, same quality of writing and art we've come to expect from FFG. Same price point - just the content is different. Which announcement makes you more excited?
Edited by Desslok