I agree that it must not be unintentional (unless there's a rule in the rulebook that says, "servants only work with cards of the same class", but I doubt that as there is no such instruction for the raven.

I agree that it must not be unintentional (unless there's a rule in the rulebook that says, "servants only work with cards of the same class", but I doubt that as there is no such instruction for the raven.

There is not, and I'm almost sure the opposition is true.

I agree that it must not be unintentional (unless there's a rule in the rulebook that says, "servants only work with cards of the same class", but I doubt that as there is no such instruction for the raven.

There is not, and I'm almost sure the opposition is true.

Pardon me, but the opposite of what is true? That it is not unintentional?

I agree that it must not be unintentional (unless there's a rule in the rulebook that says, "servants only work with cards of the same class", but I doubt that as there is no such instruction for the raven.

There weren't any need for it before, though - it's possible that it's included in all future versions that include servants, and that would in itself patch any such "hole".

That being said, I'd find that incredibly unlikely (and - although these combinations could arguably be very powerful - incredibly boring).

Either way, it'd be an inelegant solution. With Unkindness in mind, the wording on the Soulbinder cards can't possibly be unintentional.

The real question (to me) is wether we'll be able to have two Servants at once or not, or if there's going to be a general rule of limiting the Overlord to one Servant at a time. Because while I'm willing to file the combination of an Unkindness deck and Soulbinder deck as "quite powerful", I'd have a hard time not seeing two servants on the board as simply broken. But it's hard to say for sure.

I agree that it must not be unintentional (unless there's a rule in the rulebook that says, "servants only work with cards of the same class", but I doubt that as there is no such instruction for the raven.

There is not, and I'm almost sure the opposition is true.

Pardon me, but the opposite of what is true? That it is not unintentional?

I'm almost sure to have seen somewhere in Manor of Ravens that any class that could target a Servant could be played on all servant and not the one from the particuliar class

Gotcha. I agree. If the class cards can be played on any servant, it's intentional.