Acquire when stressed

By Uumbuku, in X-Wing Rules Questions

Ok. Specific example. Bossk with a mountain of Zuckuss crew stress and K4 Security Droid crew. Can he acquire a target lock when stressed?

Rule book.

While a ship has at least one stress token, it cannot execute red maneuvers or perform any actions (even free actions).

Rules Reference.

• If an ability instructs a ship to “acquire a target lock,” this is different than performing an acquire a target lock action. The ship acquires the target lock without performing an action, and it may do so even if it has already performed the acquire a target lock action this round.

As I read it the acquire is not considered a free action therefore a stressed ship can still perform the target lock. It seems to be equivalent to being assigned a token apart from the restrictions of range for the lock.

Am I wrong?

Ok. Specific example. Bossk with a mountain of Zuckuss crew stress and K4 Security Droid crew. Can he acquire a target lock when stressed?

Rule book.

While a ship has at least one stress token, it cannot execute red maneuvers or perform any actions (even free actions).

Rules Reference.

• If an ability instructs a ship to “acquire a target lock,” this is different than performing an acquire a target lock action. The ship acquires the target lock without performing an action, and it may do so even if it has already performed the acquire a target lock action this round.

As I read it the acquire is not considered a free action therefore a stressed ship can still perform the target lock. It seems to be equivalent to being assigned a token apart from the restrictions of range for the lock.

Am I wrong?

You are correct. 'Acquiring a target lock' doesn't require actions and can be done whilst stressed.

That's good. Good for the list I am planning.

Cheers.

if it was than Hobbie would be completely pointless lol. In fact hes the pilot that made me wonder if i had that rule wrong.

"Acquire a TL, remove a stress" - first time i read that i went "...thats impossible..." - nope because i didnt know about the ruling on it.