Also missing is "Comedy thread mocking the latest overreaction".

I don't think everyone's supposed to fill their entire card instantly in Bingo...

It's called a "cover all" and you're right: it's not done instantly.

I don't think everyone's supposed to fill their entire card instantly in Bingo...

It's called a "cover all" and you're right: it's not done instantly.

Not in Bingo, but pretty common in X-Wingo !

My X-wingo card needs:

1. More Wookiees, please. (Auzituck)

2. We want Jabba! (Scum Epic)

3. Why not Prequel Ships?

Great idea! I know we see a lot of repetition but it never hits home until you see it presented like that. Not a single square made me think "Nah, not going to get that one!"

I wish my opponent's manouevres were as predicable as the responses to FFG articles.

Well done fella.

There should be a square for "Worthless RNG"

Just to cover fickle's inevitable reactions.

Don't think we'll ever top r3 in the "worthless rng" department, so it'll probably be a waste of a square

Seismic Torps and blacksun slicers having dice results in their card text make me REALLY ******* weary, though

False, we will never top R5-K6 or R5-D8 in the worthless RNG department. R3 Astromech is just the cherry on top.

False, we will never top R5-K6 or R5-D8 in the worthless RNG department. R3 Astromech is just the cherry on top.

Sure, but we're talking future releases for the purposes of preview bingo

Ie "I don't think ffg will ever have another accident as bad as r3 again"

Then again, they did make r3 to begin with...

Another one: "speculation about text of card that was already spoiled in a prior article"

Also: "I can't believe no one has pointed out <thing> yet" when <thing> was thouroughly discussed when it was first revelead in a prior article.

Why this thread and not a gunboat thread?

Just kidding, love it. I almost want to print a few off for the Gencon announcements.

After this wave, I can't believe there's no "auto-include title is good/dumb"

There should be a square for "Worthless RNG"

Just to cover fickle's inevitable reactions.

There should be a square for "Worthless RNG"

Just to cover fickle's inevitable reactions.

If we're going to target specific players' reactions, then we should also add:

"Posting a newly-created emoticon based off a new ship or pilot" (Joe Boss Red Seven)

And

"Vehemently complaining about something unimportant that almost everybody else thinks is just fine" (Paragoombaslayer)

My only concern is that the items on the bingo list are the current preview meta. Putting them on the bingo reinforces and promotes that meta. It could become so strong that breaking away from our current preview meta may eventually require power creep and PSAs.

My only concern is that the items on the bingo list are the current preview meta. Putting them on the bingo reinforces and promotes that meta. It could become so strong that breaking away from our current preview meta may eventually require power creep and PSAs.

OH GOD HOW DID I FORGET "SPURIOUS PSA"?

Also missing is "Comedy thread mocking the latest overreaction".

This is all getting way to post-modern for me

Don't forget "Rules error in the article's text."

Also, "Massive excitement over new combo that obviously doesn't work if you actually read the card or understand the rules of the game."

Man, Vessery with Tie/D and HLC is going to ruin things!

Don't forget "Rules error in the article's text."

Also, "Massive excitement over new combo that obviously doesn't work if you actually read the card or understand the rules of the game."

Man, Vessery with Tie/D and HLC is going to ruin things!

Technically he's no worse than he was before the title

I think this thread just nutshelled the entire X-wing forum.

This is all getting way to post-modern for me

Methinks the scoundrel doth protest too much

Petition to add "Petition to..." on the Bingo card somwhere.

I'm glad I'm able to only fill one, and even that is in passing.

Gunboat!

This thread needs a medium base tbh.

Or:

"Missed the opportunity to create a medium base size"

( I know I'm guilty of this one - certainly thinking it more times than writing it )

If we're going to target specific players' reactions...

Let's not.

OP went to the effort to disclaim (in a highly witty manner), that this was not intended to vilify anyone in particular.

Let's keep with the spirit of that.

While I love this, I feel like the free space being "FFG makes obvious error in article" would have got the biggest laugh out of me.