So, i was reading this card right all along!
Suck that unoffical email FAQ thread!
Time to make some gonkin' lists!
So, i was reading this card right all along!
Suck that unoffical email FAQ thread!
Time to make some gonkin' lists!
So, i was reading this card right all along!
Suck that unoffical email FAQ thread!
Time to make some gonkin' lists!
Who pays attention to email rulings anyway. Gonk Gonk.
Next time listen to me instead!
![]()
(Parravon is not impressed)
No, not overly. There's been a few decisions made of late that just seem to go against the spirit and word of the rules. Someone asked FFG for an answer, which they provided, and then duly reversed in the next FAQ. That and the rather sloppy writing of card text of late.
It's not the rulings that are ticking me off, it's the inconsistencies. When a card is pre-released, then FAQ'd even before the expansion is released, what does that tell everyone? That the basic intent of how the card should work doesn't actually match up with the text. What are the playtesters doing?
Geez, is it too much to ask for them to get it right the first time?
No, not overly. There's been a few decisions made of late that just seem to go against the spirit and word of the rules. Someone asked FFG for an answer, which they provided, and then duly reversed in the next FAQ. That and the rather sloppy writing of card text of late.
It's not the rulings that are ticking me off, it's the inconsistencies. When a card is pre-released, then FAQ'd even before the expansion is released, what does that tell everyone? That the basic intent of how the card should work doesn't actually match up with the text. What are the playtesters doing?
Geez, is it too much to ask for them to get it right the first time?
Have they ever actually put something in the FAQ before it released? I think I've seen some email rulings, but the stuff I can recall they haven't added new entries to the FAQ until after the expansion is released.