I'm so, so sorry guys. I hope we don't make a similar mistake in a few months and elect Donald Trump.
If not Trump, then who? Can you categorically give me a reason (or reasons) not to have him elected? What makes Sanders or Clinton (and let's be frank, the system is rigged for her) a better choice?
Literally anyone is better than Trump. He's a disaster on every level and a horrible human being.
Trump is a complete idiot on foreign policy, which is kind of a big problem for the POTUS.
SANGER: So, it’s a deal you would inherit if you were elected, so what I’m trying to get at is, what would you insist on. Are the restrictions on nuclear not long enough, are the missile restrictions not strong enough?TRUMP: Certainly the deal is not long enough. Because at the end of the deal they’re going to have great nuclear capability. So certainly the deal isn’t long enough. I would never have given them back the $150 billion under any circumstances. I would’ve never allowed that to happen. They are, they are now rich, and did you notice they’re buying from everybody but the United States? They’re buying planes, they’re buying everything, they’re buying from everybody but the United States. I would never have made the deal.
SANGER: Our law prevents us from selling to them, sir.
TRUMP: Uh, excuse me?
SANGER: Our law prevents us from selling any planes or, we still have sanctions in the U.S. that would prevent the U.S. from being able to sell that equipment.
TRUMP: So, how stupid is that? We give them the money, and we now say, “Go buy Airbus instead of Boeing,” right? So how stupid is that? In itself, what you just said, which is correct by the way, but would they now go and buy, you know, they bought 118 approximately, 118 Airbus planes. They didn’t buy Boeing planes, O.K.? We give them the money, and we say you can’t spend it in the United States, and create wealth and jobs in the United States. And on top of it, they didn’t, they in theory, I guess, cannot do that, you know, based on what I’ve understood. They can’t do that. It’s hard to believe. We gave them $150 billion and they can’t spend it in our country.
SANGER: So you would lift the domestic sanctions so they could buy American goods?
TRUMP: Well, I wouldn’t have given them back the money. So I wouldn’t be in that position. I would never have given them back the – that would never be a part of the negotiation. I would have never, ever given it to them, and I would’ve made a better deal than they made, without the money, and I would’ve made a better deal.
SANGER: The question was about cyber, how would you envision using cyberweapons? Cyberweapons in an attack to take out a power grid in a city, so forth.
TRUMP: First off, we’re so obsolete in cyber. We’re the ones that sort of were very much involved with the creation, but we’re so obsolete, we just seem to be toyed with by so many different countries, already. And we don’t know who’s doing what. We don’t know who’s got the power, who’s got that capability, some people say it’s China, some people say it’s Russia. But certainly cyber has to be a, you know, certainly cyber has to be in our thought process, very strongly in our thought process. Inconceivable that, inconceivable the power of cyber. But as you say, you can take out, you can take out, you can make countries nonfunctioning with a strong use of cyber. I don’t think we’re there. I don’t think we’re as advanced as other countries are, and I think you probably would agree with that. I don’t think we’re advanced, I think we’re going backwards in so many different ways. I think we’re going backwards with our military. I certainly don’t think we are, we move forward with cyber, but other countries are moving forward at a much more rapid pace. We are frankly not being led very well in terms of the protection of this country.
But oh, let's talk about other things.
Like how he said during the Republican debates that he would force American soldiers to commit war crimes.
Or how his health care plan involves dismantling the ACA with nothing to replace it.
Or how his business strategies are so destructive George W Bush's Treasury Secretary begged people not to vote for him. When George W Bush's cabinet are wary of the Republican candidate, that's not a good sign.
Or how he's a complete laughingstock to nations outside the US.
Or how he lies like a rug, moreso than even the norm for politicians.
Basically, Trump sucks. He sucks bad. Even when talking to Republicans who say they're going to vote for him, they can't seem to actually deny that he's a dishonest, brainless, thin-skinned, loud-mouthed embarrassment to their party. Prominent Republican politicians find themselves in the hilarious position of having to support him to toe the party line while simultaneously disowning him to protect their own reputations during down-ticket elections.
Edited by WingedSpider
