I'm busy creating a Hutt Nemesis for a campaign I'm setting up. The campaign is set 8 years before The Force Awakens, but the Hutt was born 432 years before then.
At some point Jabba the Hutt banished him and now a Hutt, or group of Hutts, have put a Death Mark on him.
I'd like his banishment to be long before The Clone Wars, but the Bounty is recent. My initial thoughts are that Jabba banished him, and none dared oppose the Mighty Jabba, but now he's dead an opportunist Hutt or group of Hutts are out to prove their worth by arranging the hit.
So my questions are:
Why would Jabba the Hutt publicly banish another Hutt?
Why would other Hutts want him dead?
Coercion and Deception are my Hutt Nemesis's weapons of choice. He uses people then discards them when they're no longer useful or profitable. Blackmail, bullying, defrauding, tyranny and oppression. He likes controlling everyone and everything, and won't do what anyone else wants. Even Jabba would be ignored.
I know the Hutts have rules on how to treat slaves, and my Hutt villain doesn't allow his slaves any rights. They're his property to do with as he wants and he'll never allow them freedom.
He's not nice!
And that's by Hutt standards.
Edited by Tyres Kem