So, I am new to this forum, and Descent in general. One issue i had, and still have to a lesser extent, is the HUGE number of thread regarding Roads to Legend. Was wondering if we could create a sub-forum for RtL so us newbs can navigate this forum easier and find what we might be looking for. When I did a search for first expansion to buy, the first page was all RtL threads. I am sure I am not the only one having this issue. Just wondering on the feasibility of this and others opinions.
Had a thought about creating a sub-forum
There's a thread for the quest vault, I don't think it would be a giant issue to create a subforum for RtL. That sounds like a great idea.
At the very least, I'd like to see a pinned thread for RtL bug reporting.
A bunch of the other FFG forums do this, (heck, IA has four subs). Any clue who would actually take care of this?
"This forum led by FFG Anton"
Right, found it. Thanks.
When in doubt ask Zaltyre... you know until he gets tired of your nagging
When in doubt ask Zaltyre... you know until he gets tired of your nagging
Kinda figure the Z is already annoyed. His answer was basically just pointing at the sign in the corner, (I also picture a big ol brow furrow and a frown, but, no stomping).
When in doubt ask Zaltyre... you know until he gets tired of your nagging
Kinda figure the Z is already annoyed. His answer was basically just pointing at the sign in the corner, (I also picture a big ol brow furrow and a frown, but, no stomping).
Kellos save us if the stomping begins...
That's how I know my wife is SUPER peeved. The point and stomp preceded by crossed arms. And if the word "fine" is uttered, well, that is when i set up one of my tents in the yard.
Personally, I'm all for it. I think this forums has gotten way bogged down with RtL threads.
And before anyone gets defensive, there is nothing against RtL threads.
And before anyone gets defensive, there is nothing against RtL threads.
Absolutely not. There's just alot of them, enough for their own forum.
Perzactly, almost like you read my mind... if I had one.
A bunch of the other FFG forums do this, (heck, IA has four subs). Any clue who would actually take care of this?
Having them make a sub-thread for RtL would mean them actually acknowledging this forum exists and people talk about RtL on it - which would mean their excuses for not responding to any questions ever would be gone. They aren't going to give up that ace any time soon
A bunch of the other FFG forums do this, (heck, IA has four subs). Any clue who would actually take care of this?
Having them make a sub-thread for RtL would mean them actually acknowledging this forum exists and people talk about RtL on it - which would mean their excuses for not responding to any questions ever would be gone. They aren't going to give up that ace any time soon
That's not a real thing. I've seen this forum publicly referenced in rules responses (to the effect of, "Steve-O's reasoning is correct. This is how that problem is resolved...") I've also experienced very fast responses to technical problems with the quest vault (posted in the sub forum) resulting in followup emails, messages, etc.
This forum is neither hidden nor unobserved. Not that I speak for the Descent staff, but in my opinion there aren't often FFG posts in this forum because
1) They would rapidly get bogged down trying to respond to everyone. There simply is not enough time for personal responses to all of our questions/feedback.
2) Their job is not to be forum moderators, but game developers. Rather than spending their time conversing on the forums, they're busy developing content.
Edited by ZaltyreYou will know Zaltyre is peeved when a Volucrix Reaver pops out of your cereal box to attack you!
You will know Zaltyre is peeved when a Volucrix Reaver pops out of your cereal box to attack you!
You never know which of those Cheerios is a mimic.
So, did anybody contact FFG in favor of a new sub for the RtL app yet?
So, did anybody contact FFG in favor of a new sub for the RtL app yet?
I did. I emailed the mod just after it was suggested. It was May 23.
edited for research
Edited by Hersh