Arkham Horror LCG is also a coop LCG.

The Star War LCG was once a coop LCG, but redesigned.

Are two coop LCGs too many for FFG?

Does FFG have enough designers for the upcoming LCG?

Will Nate be the designer of AH LCG?

Is it the end of LotR LCG?

The Product code of the Ruin of Belegost is MEC63, the Grey Haven is MEC47,

there're room for the dreamchasing cycle(48-53), The return of the King saga(54, 55), one deluxe(56), and one more cycle(57-62)

But the delayed previews of the dreamchasing cycle seems to show the dead end of the game.

I hope the AH LCG is just the line of COC LCG.

What the hell are you talking about? Arkham Horror LCG? Never heard of it.

He means Call of Cthulhu LCG.

He means Call of Cthulhu LCG.

I don't think he does, as CoC LCG is not a co-op, but dueling game. And it's also already discontinued.

OP, mind elaborating on that Arkham Horror LCG you're talking about?

This game is dieing!

Hahaha

Oh, wait. You're serious?

This guy got me good. I was literally dreaming of a cooperative Lovecraftian card game, and here he goes and pretends it to be real, and then I go to search for it in google and find nothing but desperation. Thanks.

To some people drinking responsibly means "Don't spill it". I think the OP belongs in that group.

He does have a point about the product codes though. Is it normal for a POD scenario to have a number that advanced than current cycle releases?

Maybe it is referred to Legend of the 5 Rings, which, indeed, will replace Call of Cthulhu LCG ?

He does have a point about the product codes though. Is it normal for a POD scenario to have a number that advanced than current cycle releases?

I think yes, Massing at Osgiliath is MEC15 (should have been 5) and Battle of Lake Town is 35 (should have been 17)

He does have a point about the product codes though. Is it normal for a POD scenario to have a number that advanced than current cycle releases?

I think yes, Massing at Osgiliath is MEC15 (should have been 5) and Battle of Lake Town is 35 (should have been 17)

Not sure at the prudence of engaging this discussion, but might this not imply that a further cycle is indeed planned, and the game is thus alivealiveALIVE?

He does have a point about the product codes though. Is it normal for a POD scenario to have a number that advanced than current cycle releases?

I think yes, Massing at Osgiliath is MEC15 (should have been 5) and Battle of Lake Town is 35 (should have been 17)

Not sure at the prudence of engaging this discussion, but might this not imply that a further cycle is indeed planned, and the game is thus alivealiveALIVE?

Obviously we are discussing for fun!

The point is that I would like more than a full cycle after the end of the Sagas

He does have a point about the product codes though. Is it normal for a POD scenario to have a number that advanced than current cycle releases?

I think yes, Massing at Osgiliath is MEC15 (should have been 5) and Battle of Lake Town is 35 (should have been 17)

Not sure at the prudence of engaging this discussion, but might this not imply that a further cycle is indeed planned, and the game is thus alivealiveALIVE?

Obviously we are discussing for fun!

The point is that I would like more than a full cycle after the end of the Sagas

Either way, there will be a lot more nightmare content to come...

And I could see myself replaying many of the scenarios even if they stopped producing content.

We finally have a deep and playable card pool. We've literally waited years for this. It would be so sad if the game were to end now.

If the game ended FFG would continue printing it for a long time. They've said many times it's massively popular.

God, at times I hate these forums so much.

God, at times I hate these forums so much.

It's all in good fun

The only, only, only good reason I could stand Lotr to stop would be à coop Cthulu Lcg

The only, only, only good reason I could stand Lotr to stop would be à coop Cthulu Lcg

How's that's a reason to stop LotR? =O

It's like stopping Star Wars LCG because of Game of Thrones LCG.

Oh I do agree. I would not mind having both card games!

Are we getting trolled ? Roast him slowly!

The only, only, only good reason I could stand Lotr to stop would be à coop Cthulu Lcg

How's that's a reason to stop LotR? =O

It's like stopping Star Wars LCG because of Game of Thrones LCG.

Good point.

Another good point, for me at least, is I love Tolkien and couldn't care less about Lovecraft.

LOTR LCG is massively popular. If FFG quits developing this game any time in the near future, I will never buy any FFG products again, and that is a promise.

I wonder if OP is going to come back while sober and explain what he meant.