He absolutely is trying to censor people through peer pressure and bullying. He has implied quite strongly that anybody that wasn't thrilled with an FFG release is a nagger with poor manners. That is an attack on the posters themselves, rather than their position, which I find distasteful.
I'm also very disappointed, though not surprised that so many people quickly jumped on the bullying train. You may not like Hobo, and he's so very wrong about the Star Trek reboots, but I've never seen him generally attack someone for having thoughts.
This is of course the internet, you can pretty much conduct yourself however you want as long as it's within the terms of service, but are you sure you want to support the suppression of ideas?
Seeing as you ask, I am bang up alongside discouraging bad ideas. That's not "bullying" or "peer pressure", it's criticism. And it's how we grow as a society.
Hmmmm. I've seen this somewhere before, a bunch of people who took a complaint about a subset of a group as tarring all of that group with the same brush, and were super-duper sensitive to "bullying" and "censorship" when it wasn't them doing it. What were those idiots called? GrumbleGuts? GilbertGrape? GoonerGrump? I wonder what happened to them?
FWIW I like Hobo very much, there's just a couple of things I think he's spectacularly wrong about.
