I see a lot of complaining that the TIE Advanced Prototype is better than the TIE Advanced, and it shouldn't be. I'd like to let you know that this tells me you all work in the Tech industry.
In the tech industry, a prototype is a buggy first edition that needs refinement and streamlining, it is v0.9.
If you look at automobiles, a prototype is the advertisement. It is the designer's dream: sleek, dramatic, and with all the bells and whistles. If enough people like it, the company decides to make it and the "bean counters" get involved.
"What about saving money by not having heated seats in the back? We can make an extra 0.4% profit if we reduce horsepower by half. What about pedestrian impact standards? I think the headlights off that Ford Taurus will fit, and now we don't need a new machine to make headlights."
"Just stick TIE Bomber solar panels on them, their efficiency is within spec. That targeting computer is a loss, make it an optional extra. If we reduce maneuvering capabilities by a little bit, we can sell them at 5% less but make 10% more profit."
The A-wing Prototype pilot is a tech prototype. The TIE advanced prototype is a car prototype.
Edited by AEIllingworth