To all the "lawyers" of X-wing.
![]()
Zeta Leader reads:
When attacking, if you are not stressed, you may receive 1 stress token to roll 1 additional attack die.
My question is, when exactly does the receive 1 stress token to roll 1 additional attack die part happen.
First off, the card says "when attacking", so you don't declare it at the start of Combat Phase or anything, strictly when performing an attack, ok, I get that.
But, do I get to roll the 2 "natural" (3 at R1) dice and then decide whether to suck up Stress to roll additional one?
Or, do I have to declare when picking-up my dice (about to roll), that I'm going to roll one more using this ability, gaining Stress in the process.
This wouldn't be of much importance, if not for Cool Hand EPT that I simply love running on ZL.
Here's why (Cool Hand's text for reference): When you receive a stress token, you may discard this card to assign 1 focus or evade token to your ship.
So, I'm rolling an extra die and get to use resulting Stress to grab Focus or Evade token (once).
And here's where the things get more interesting.
Normally, when going all Shiny and Chrome with ZL, I take TL as action, then during the actual shooting; add one Red for Stress, get Focus from Cool Hand and see what gets rolled. Let's call it an "insurance" scenario, kind of like poor man's Glitterstim.
Now, if I knew what I've rolled with the 2 (3 at R1) initial dice and only then got to decide about rolling an extra one via ZL's pilot abilty, this would change things a bit. This time, creating a "strategic" scenario.
My choice regarding the use of Cool Hand would be based on the result of initial dice. I might not want to burn my Cool Hand for Focus if I rolled natural Hits/Crits on them.
Say I'm fine with having the extra die rely only on TL for reroll/modification, which would still have a hefty 0.75 chance of success.
Or, I could decide to use Cool Hand to refill my Comm Relay during combat instead, knowing that the attack doesn't need that Focus boost.
So, based on your interpretation - which of the scenarios do I pick, is there a ruling already in for a similar timing case, that can be used as a precedent?
Or did I miss something that would make the case obvious altogether in the light of manual/FAQs?
Edited by Mef82